Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp (1963)

Read a random definition: executione judicii

A quick definition of School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp (1963):

School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp (1963) is a court case that says public schools can't make students do religious activities like reading the Bible or saying the Lord's Prayer. This is because it goes against the First Amendment, which says the government can't make people follow a certain religion. The court said that laws must have a good reason that isn't religious, and can't favor one religion over another. Even though some people disagreed, this case is still important today.

A more thorough explanation:

School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp (1963) is a U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled that mandatory religious activities in public schools, such as Bible readings and reciting the Lord's Prayer, violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This means that public schools cannot force students to participate in religious activities as part of their curriculum.

For example, in this case, two families sued their school district because their children were required to read from the Bible and recite the Lord's Prayer every day in school. The Supreme Court ruled that this was unconstitutional because it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing or promoting any religion. This means that the government cannot favor one religion over another or force people to participate in religious activities. The Court ruled that the school district's argument that the readings fostered good morals was not enough to justify the religious nature of the activities.

This case is still important today because it sets a precedent for the separation of church and state in public schools. Public schools must remain neutral when it comes to religion and cannot promote or favor any particular religion.

Schenck v. United States (1919) | Scienter

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.