Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Section 101 rejection

Read a random definition: innocent agent

A quick definition of Section 101 rejection:

A Section 101 rejection is when a patent examiner says that an invention is not eligible for a patent because it doesn't fit into the categories of things that can be patented. This can happen if the invention is too abstract or if it's something that can't be owned, like a natural phenomenon. It's like a teacher saying that a student's project doesn't fit the assignment. The student would have to go back and try again to make something that fits the rules.

A more thorough explanation:

A Section 101 rejection is when a patent examiner finds that a claim in a patent application is not eligible for patent protection because it is based on nonstatutory subject matter. This means that the invention is not something that can be patented under the law.

For example, if someone tried to patent a natural phenomenon like a rainbow, the patent examiner would issue a Section 101 rejection because it is not something that can be patented.

Another example would be if someone tried to patent an abstract idea like a mathematical formula. This would also be rejected under Section 101 because it is not something that can be patented.

Overall, a Section 101 rejection is a way for the patent office to ensure that only inventions that are truly new and useful are granted patent protection.

SECTION 43(A) ACTION | Section 102 rejection

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.