Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Section 1981

Read a random definition: Spam

A quick definition of Section 1981:

Section 1981 is a law that says everyone in the United States has the right to be treated fairly, no matter what their skin color is. This law protects people from discrimination by individuals, companies, and even the government. It guarantees that everyone has the same rights to make contracts, go to court, and be protected by the law. If someone is treated unfairly because of their race, they can use this law to fight back and get justice.

A more thorough explanation:

Section 1981 is a law that guarantees certain rights to all citizens of the United States and protects those rights against discrimination by non-government and state entities. It comes from Section 1 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act.

Section 1981(a) guarantees the following rights:

  • The right to make and enforce contracts
  • The right to sue and be parties in legal proceedings
  • The right to give evidence
  • The right to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens
  • The right to be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other

Section 1981 protects against intentional racial discrimination by state governments, private individuals, and non-government entities. It differs from Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which also protects against discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, or religion, but applies to both intentional and disparate impact discrimination. Title VII also requires an EEOC charge to be filed before bringing claims to court and has a cap on damages.

For example, in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that Section 1981 bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property. In CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Section 1981 extends to retaliation claims.

Plaintiffs alleging racial discrimination will often allege Section 1981 and Title VII claims together (provided the plaintiff filed an EEOC charge and has received a right to sue letter from the EEOC).

Section 1244 Stock | Section 4(1 ½)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
1a2b3c4d26z
19:42
top 5 of all time and it aint 4
babycat
19:43
We sharing Goodreads on here?
1a2b3c4d26z
19:43
jurassic park unironically good
1a2b3c4d26z
19:43
crime and punishment top 1
1a2b3c4d26z
19:43
im okay with being called basic for that one
2big2fail
19:44
im gatekeeping my current book
Dkk
19:44
@2big2fail: looks like an Aristotle wannabe.
2big2fail
19:44
whatever. im just reading the financial times
1a2b3c4d26z
19:44
ft goated
concorde
19:45
I hate Dostoevsky
2big2fail
19:45
studying cloud computing, not the cloud of unknowing
babycat
19:45
@1a2b3c4d26z: serotonin is my fave houellebecq
1a2b3c4d26z
19:45
chefs kiss mwah
2big2fail
19:45
i honestly dont understand why people like houellebecq
1a2b3c4d26z
19:45
I'll try to describe how I feel about him
2big2fail
19:46
my favorite french authors are balzac and proust, as basic as that is
1a2b3c4d26z
19:46
basically I read his book and the whole time I read it I liked it so I finished it and I said hm I liked that book written by the author houellebecq
1a2b3c4d26z
19:46
balzac hahaha
2big2fail
19:46
lost illusions is goated
does it take longer to hear back if u applied to scholarships for schools like ucla???
Dkk
19:47
For Houellebecq I have only read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomised
JumpySubsequentDolphin
19:47
you guys should read averroes
also do we think ucla wont do a wave tmw cuz they did a tiny one tonight, can schools do 2 days ina. row
JumpySubsequentDolphin
19:47
perhaps read the incoherence of philosophy first and then read averroes’ response: “the incoherence of the incoherence”
2big2fail
19:47
@Dkk: i read that one. just thought it was boring and not really in touch with reality
JumpySubsequentDolphin
19:47
SPLITTY usually they’re Friday!
Dkk
19:48
@2big2fail: I agree.
HUH then what the heck is this wave tonight ab are they tryna give us an attack???
babycat
19:49
@texaslawhopefully: don’t really remember it but my ibooks library says i read it in 2020. that whole year is a haze.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.