Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Section 1981

Read a random definition: dangerous drug

A quick definition of Section 1981:

Section 1981 is a law that says everyone in the United States has the right to be treated fairly, no matter what their skin color is. This law protects people from discrimination by individuals, companies, and even the government. It guarantees that everyone has the same rights to make contracts, go to court, and be protected by the law. If someone is treated unfairly because of their race, they can use this law to fight back and get justice.

A more thorough explanation:

Section 1981 is a law that guarantees certain rights to all citizens of the United States and protects those rights against discrimination by non-government and state entities. It comes from Section 1 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act.

Section 1981(a) guarantees the following rights:

  • The right to make and enforce contracts
  • The right to sue and be parties in legal proceedings
  • The right to give evidence
  • The right to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens
  • The right to be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other

Section 1981 protects against intentional racial discrimination by state governments, private individuals, and non-government entities. It differs from Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which also protects against discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, or religion, but applies to both intentional and disparate impact discrimination. Title VII also requires an EEOC charge to be filed before bringing claims to court and has a cap on damages.

For example, in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that Section 1981 bars all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property. In CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Section 1981 extends to retaliation claims.

Plaintiffs alleging racial discrimination will often allege Section 1981 and Title VII claims together (provided the plaintiff filed an EEOC charge and has received a right to sue letter from the EEOC).

Section 1244 Stock | Section 4(1 ½)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.