Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

selective prosecution

Read a random definition: habere facias seisinam

A quick definition of selective prosecution:

Selective prosecution is when a prosecutor chooses to bring criminal charges against someone based on their own personal decision, rather than following the usual procedures of their office. This is not fair if the prosecutor is singling out one person for prosecution while others in similar situations are not being prosecuted. This is against the law and violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Selective prosecution is the practice of a prosecutor choosing to bring criminal charges against someone based on their personal discretion, rather than following the normal procedures of the prosecuting authority's office. This can be considered a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment if the defendant is singled out for prosecution while others in similar situations have not been prosecuted, and the prosecutor's reasons for doing so are not valid.

One example of selective prosecution is when a prosecutor chooses to bring charges against a person of a certain race or ethnicity, while ignoring similar behavior by people of other races or ethnicities. For instance, if a prosecutor only brings drug charges against Black people in a certain neighborhood, while ignoring drug use by white people in the same area, this would be considered selective prosecution.

Another example is when a prosecutor chooses to bring charges against a political opponent or someone who has criticized them, while ignoring similar behavior by their allies or supporters. This can be seen as an abuse of power and a violation of the defendant's rights.

These examples illustrate how selective prosecution can be used to unfairly target certain individuals or groups, while allowing others to escape punishment for similar behavior. This undermines the principles of fairness and equality under the law, and can erode public trust in the justice system.

selective incorporation | selective prospectivity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.