Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Shared equity mortgage

Read a random definition: mutuality doctrine

A quick definition of Shared equity mortgage:

Shared equity mortgage: A type of mortgage where the lender owns a part of the house, usually half. This helps people with lower incomes get a mortgage because the lender has more security. When the house is sold, the lender gets their loan back plus their share of the profits. Shared equity mortgages may have rules about who can buy the house and how much it can be sold for later on.

A more thorough explanation:

Shared equity mortgage is a type of mortgage where the lender keeps a portion, normally half, of the equity in the house. This means that when a house is sold, the lender will be paid all of the loan plus their portion of the profits.

Shared equity mortgages are designed to help lower income individuals receive mortgages because the lender has more security by owning part of the property. However, shared equities may come with other requirements like limiting who can purchase the home or limit the sale price later on because shared equity lenders are often trying to limit housing costs for low income individuals.

Let's say you want to buy a house for $200,000 but you only have $20,000 for a down payment. You could get a shared equity mortgage where the lender puts up the other $80,000 for the down payment. In return, the lender would own half of the equity in the house.

Now, let's say you sell the house for $300,000. The lender would get their original $80,000 back plus half of the $100,000 profit, which would be $50,000. You would get the other $170,000.

This type of mortgage can be helpful for people who don't have a lot of money for a down payment but still want to buy a house. It can also be helpful for lenders because they have more security by owning part of the property.

shared custody | shareholder

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 10 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
nope cornell can be 2.
cornell is incredibly based
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
texaslawhopefully
17:03
"Two recent polls found opposition to pardoning the J6ers at 57 and 59 percent, respectively, and that was before Americans understood that even the cop-beaters in the crowd that day would be let off scot-free."
I wonder if this chat has mods
17:04
as most dictators who have come into power do, he appealed to the masses just to turn face once in power
Barely nutty
Dkk
17:04
@texas maybe so. Maybe so.
17:04
we have been duped.
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.