Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Shelley's Case, Rule in

Read a random definition: rationabilibus divisis

A quick definition of Shelley's Case, Rule in:

SHELLEY'S CASE, RULE IN: A legal rule that says if someone is given a piece of property and the property is also supposed to go to their heirs after they die, the person actually gets to keep the property and it doesn't go to their heirs. This rule has been around for a long time, but most states don't use it anymore. Some people think it's not very helpful or safe to use this rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The Rule in Shelley's Case is a legal principle that applies to property law. It states that if a single grant gives a freehold estate to a person and a remainder to the person's heirs, the remainder belongs to the named person and not the heirs. This means that the person is considered to have a fee simple absolute.

For example, if John is granted a property with the condition that it will go to his heirs after his death, the Rule in Shelley's Case would apply. This means that John would have complete ownership of the property, and his heirs would not have any rights to it until after his death.

The Rule in Shelley's Case has been around since the 14th century and is named after a famous 16th-century case. However, it has been abolished in most states.

Overall, the Rule in Shelley's Case is a legal principle that determines who has ownership of a property in certain situations. It is important to understand this rule when dealing with property law.

sharp | shell game

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.