Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sixth-sentence remand

Read a random definition: de lunatico inquirendo

A quick definition of sixth-sentence remand:

A remand is when a court sends a case or claim back to where it came from for more work. There are different types of remands, like a fourth-sentence remand for social-security benefits, where the court decides if the decision made by the Commissioner of Social Security should be affirmed, modified, or reversed. Another type is a sixth-sentence remand, where new evidence is available that might change the outcome of the case. The court can send the case back to the Commissioner of Social Security for further action. Remand can also mean sending an accused person back to custody after a preliminary examination.

A more thorough explanation:

A sixth-sentence remand is a legal term used in a claim for social-security benefits. It refers to a court's decision to send the case back to the Commissioner of Social Security for further action because new evidence has become available that might change the outcome of the proceeding.

The term "sixth-sentence" comes from the sixth sentence of 42 USCA § 405(g), which allows the court to remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further action if there is new evidence that is material and good cause for not incorporating it into the record in a prior proceeding.

For example, if a person filed a claim for social-security benefits and new medical evidence became available that was not considered in the initial decision, the court may order a sixth-sentence remand to allow the Commissioner of Social Security to review the new evidence and make a new decision.

Overall, a sixth-sentence remand is a legal process that allows for further review of a claim for social-security benefits when new evidence becomes available that was not considered in the initial decision.

Sixth Amendment | sixty clerks

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.