Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Son-of-Sam law

Read a random definition: ad ostium ecclesiae

A quick definition of Son-of-Sam law:

A Son-of-Sam law is a rule made by the government that stops criminals from making money by selling their stories to writers or filmmakers. This law was made because a man named David Berkowitz, who was a killer, was offered a lot of money to tell his story. The law lets the government take the money the criminal would have made and give it to the people who were hurt by the crime. The law was first made in New York in 1977, but in 1992, the highest court in America said it was not fair to stop people from talking about their lives. Many states changed their laws after that so they would be fair.

A more thorough explanation:

The Son-of-Sam law is a state law that prevents convicted criminals from making money by selling their story rights to publishers or filmmakers. This law allows prosecutors to seize any royalties earned by the criminal and place them in an escrow account for the benefit of the victim of the crime.

The Son-of-Sam law was first enacted in New York in 1977 after David Berkowitz, a serial killer who called himself "Son of Sam," was offered lucrative book deals. However, in 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court declared New York's Son-of-Sam law unconstitutional as it was seen as a regulation of speech. This led many states to amend their laws to avoid similar issues.

For example, if a convicted murderer writes a book about their crime and tries to sell the rights to a publisher, the Son-of-Sam law would prevent them from profiting from their crime. Instead, any money earned would go towards helping the victim of the crime.

Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act | sonticus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
15:17
thats odd I didn't see those stats, but ok. We talked abt this awhile back and I'm working on Columbia + Berkeley rn then Cornell, probs is I'm not gonna produce good Why X's before the 25th but whatever
https://www.lsd.law/search/cV9E6 this is artificially deflated because it's only below your stats
someone got into harvard and chicago with your stats
15:19
Why is that deflating it? isnt that a better indicator instead of choosing above median LSATs? Genuinely curious just wondering
when stats are close because of the variability you want a little above your stats and a little below to get more data, adcoms arent so finnicky that 2 points on the lsat is make or break unless it puts you above median, and even then 50% are below median so it's not as big of an impact as you might think. the reason the chanceme tool goes a little above and below your stats by default is to capture a more accurate picture
ie your softs/WE/essays might make you more or less competitive than any random applicant and the best way to account for that is to take a little above and a little below
15:21
got it, I was of the mindset that medians are pretty concrete so taking a +2 LSAT score range was just giving me irrelevant data. Thank you
15:21
Def my softs/essays are the strongest part of my application so hoping they shine through
they kind of are but you see with the data here is doesnt really change your chances going from 172 to 170
yeah youll be in a good place for this cycle
15:22
yeah I guess thats true, I've also been looking at "Included" not "Only" for URM so maybe that's a diff too
15:22
Appreciate it man!
yeah included is giving you data for nURM which isnt relevant for your cycle
and ofc, good luck :)
15:24
Holiday messages from law schools should be illegal
jackfrost11770
15:27
the cornell one actually gave me a heart attack no joke
15:28
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Thanks! Will def update you as they come out hahaha
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.