Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

standard descriptive characteristics

Read a random definition: Nihil dicit

A quick definition of standard descriptive characteristics:

Standard descriptive characteristics are the basic rules that apply to a motion in parliamentary law. These rules define when the motion is allowed, what it takes precedence over, and whether it can interrupt a speaker. They also determine whether the motion needs a second, if it is debatable or amendable, what vote is required for adoption, and whether it can be reconsidered. These are the standard characteristics that apply to all motions.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Standard descriptive characteristics refer to the basic rules that apply to and define a motion in parliamentary law. These characteristics include:

  • When the motion is in order
  • Its rank - what it takes precedence over and what yields to it
  • Whether making it may interrupt a speaker
  • Whether it needs a second
  • Whether it is debatable
  • Whether it is amendable
  • What vote its adoption takes
  • Whether it can be reconsidered

Example: If a member of a student council wants to propose a new rule, they would need to follow the standard descriptive characteristics. They would need to wait until the appropriate time to make the motion, ensure that it is ranked correctly in relation to other motions, and follow the rules regarding whether it needs a second, is debatable, and what vote is required for adoption.

This example illustrates how the standard descriptive characteristics provide a framework for making motions in a parliamentary setting. By following these rules, members can ensure that their motions are made in an orderly and fair manner.

standard deduction | standard-form contract

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.