Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

standing seised to uses

Read a random definition: battered-person syndrome

A quick definition of standing seised to uses:

Standing seised to uses refers to holding title to property for the benefit or use of someone else, such as a family member. This is done through a legal conveyance called a covenant to stand seised to uses, which relies on the Statute of Uses. This statute was created in England in 1535 to prevent people from creating uses in land that deprived feudal lords of their rights. The statute made the person who enjoyed the use of the land the legal owner with the right of absolute ownership and possession. However, the courts later found ways to work around the statute by recognizing the use of equitable trusts in land-conveyancing.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Standing seised to uses refers to the holding of title for the benefit or use of another person, such as a relative in consideration of blood or marriage. It is a type of conveyance that depends on the Statute of Uses for its effect.

Statute of Uses: The Statute of Uses was an English statute enacted in 1535 that converted the equitable title held by a beneficiary to a legal one in order to make the beneficiary liable for feudal dues. The statute discouraged the granting of property subject to another's use by deeming the person who enjoys the use to have legal title with the right of absolute ownership and possession.

Example: If John conveys land to Mary subject to the use of Sarah, then Sarah becomes the legal owner of the land in fee simple. This means that Sarah has the right to use and benefit from the land, even though she is not the one who holds the title to it.

Explanation: This example illustrates how standing seised to uses works. John is the feoffee to uses, which means he holds the legal title to the land. However, Sarah is the cestui que use, which means she is the beneficiary who has the right to use and benefit from the land. The Statute of Uses converted Sarah's equitable title to a legal one, making her the legal owner of the land.

standing rule | standing to sue

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.