Connection lost
Server error
Legal Definitions - State Street Bank
Definition of State Street Bank
The term State Street Bank refers to a landmark 1998 legal decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, specifically the case of State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. This ruling significantly altered patent law in the United States, particularly concerning computer software and business methods.
Before the State Street Bank decision, it was often challenging to obtain patents for inventions that were primarily software-based or involved new ways of conducting business. Many believed that mathematical algorithms, which are fundamental to software, and abstract business processes were not eligible for patent protection. However, the Federal Circuit's ruling clarified that an invention could be patentable if it produced a "useful, concrete, and tangible result," even if it involved mathematical algorithms or a novel business process. This decision made it considerably easier to secure patents for software and business methods, opening the door for innovation in these fields.
Here are some examples illustrating the impact of the State Street Bank decision:
Example 1: Software for Energy Optimization
Imagine a company that develops a sophisticated software system using a unique algorithm to manage and optimize the energy consumption of large commercial buildings in real-time. This system learns from usage patterns, weather forecasts, and electricity prices to automatically adjust heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, significantly reducing energy costs and carbon footprint.
How it illustrates the term: Before the State Street Bank decision, this software might have been deemed unpatentable because its core was a complex mathematical algorithm. However, after the ruling, the focus shifted to whether the software produced a "useful, concrete, and tangible result"—in this case, measurable energy savings and environmental benefits—making it eligible for patent protection.
Example 2: Online Freelance Marketplace System
An entrepreneur creates an innovative online platform that connects independent freelance professionals with clients through a unique matching algorithm and a novel payment escrow system designed to ensure fair compensation and project completion. This system streamlines the hiring process and reduces disputes for both parties.
How it illustrates the term: This example represents a new "business method" implemented through software. Prior to State Street Bank, the concept of patenting a new way of conducting business, even if technologically enabled, was highly questionable. The ruling made it possible to patent such systems if they offered a practical, useful, and tangible improvement over existing methods, like improved efficiency and trust in the freelance market.
Example 3: Personalized Financial Planning Application
A financial technology (fintech) firm invents a software application that uses a proprietary algorithm to analyze a user's spending habits, income, and financial goals, then automatically generates a personalized, optimized budget and investment strategy. The application also executes micro-investments based on predefined rules.
How it illustrates the term: This combines software with a financial "business method." Before State Street Bank, the underlying mathematical models for financial analysis and the general concept of a personalized budget might have been considered abstract ideas or unpatentable business practices. The decision allowed for the patenting of such an invention because the software system provides a "useful, concrete, and tangible result" by helping individuals manage their finances more effectively and achieve specific financial outcomes.
Simple Definition
State Street Bank refers to a landmark 1998 Federal Circuit decision that significantly broadened patent eligibility for computer software and challenged the long-held belief that business methods were unpatentable. The court ruled that an invention is patentable if it produces a "useful, concrete, and tangible result," regardless of whether it involves a mathematical algorithm or a business method.