Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Stationers' Company

Read a random definition: single-act statute

A quick definition of Stationers' Company:

The Stationers' Company was a group of people who sold books and paper in London. They were created in 1557 and were given the job of making sure that books were printed correctly and didn't say anything bad about the government. They were also the first group to have the rights to control who could print and sell books, which is called copyright.

A more thorough explanation:

The Stationers' Company was an organization of stationers and their successors that was established in London in 1557. It was given the responsibility of censoring the press by the Privy Council. This company was also the first holder of the rights that we now associate with copyright.

For example, if a writer wanted to publish a book during the time of the Stationers' Company, they would have to get permission from the company. The company would then have the right to print and sell the book, and the writer would receive a portion of the profits.

The Stationers' Company played an important role in regulating the printing industry and protecting the rights of authors. It ensured that only approved books were published and that authors were fairly compensated for their work.

station | Stationers' Hall

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
12:00
I think he just wants it to go to trial
12:00
make a show of it
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:02
they're charging him with terrorism, was he ever going to get a plea deal that was even remotely worth taking?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:03
Dude wants to be famous and seen as a martyr this is his chance
GreyCeaselessMammoth
12:03
i think they want to roll the dice
I can understand that, but that's exactly why I would offer him a halfway decent plea deal as the DA. Maybe offer 25 years at medium security, as opposed to being guaranteed to die at ADX Florence.
snow
12:06
its a state case, right?
snow
12:06
not federal?
Oh yeah, my bad
snow
12:07
you're good, i was just making sure. yeah, i would take it to trial
snow
12:07
you just need one juror
snow
12:07
but i think that if i were the state, i would not be scared to bust the jury if i had to
I mean, you only need one juror to get a hung jury and a retrial, you need all 12 to get found innocent
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
I do not see him doing a long time, if he is not punished hard then more (less attractive) crazy people will come out and start murdering for social justice and expect the same
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:08
*him not doing a long time
snow
12:08
need to see what all he is charged with tbh
snow
12:09
and the possibility for parole in new york
snow
12:09
in texas murder is a 3g offense and he would have to do have that time before parole eligibility. idk how new york works
snow
12:11
half
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:11
Too public of a case, they have to go hard on the dude and in a couple years when people forget I am sure he can apply and get a lesser sentence or possibility of parole added. Dude needs to blame all the self medication he did
snow
12:13
that works in his favor that the case is public, at least this case. thats why i think the state shouldnt be scared to bust the jury if they really want to get him
@snow: I don't know what you mean by "bust the jury"
Can you elaborate?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:15
I also do not forsee him being the kind of person being able to function and be good in prison. Going to be a wake up call
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:16
He thinks his back is broke now... wait until Bubbah shows him what a broke back really is
snow
12:16
yep, in jury selection you get a panel of jurors come in and from there you eliminate the ones that you dont want, until you get twelve. "busting the jury panel" means that there wouldnt be enough jurors to form a jury for the case so they would have to get another panel
windyMagician
12:17
uw sending cycle update emails when they've had me in complete for 2 months is crazy work
snow
12:17
so if i were the state, i wouldnt be scared to go through multiple panels to get a good jury. the judge would probs be mad but oh well
windyMagician
12:18
he'll be fine in prison. he also probably has a fed case being built against him.
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
12:18
I imagine getting a non-biased jury will be very hard
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.