Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Statute of frauds

Read a random definition: downside

A quick definition of Statute of frauds:

The statute of frauds is a law that says certain contracts must be written down and signed by the people involved. This is to prevent people from lying or getting hurt. The law applies to contracts for selling or transferring land, and contracts that take longer than a year to finish. For example, if you want to buy a house, the agreement must be written and signed by both you and the seller. This way, everyone knows what they agreed to and there are no surprises later on.

A more thorough explanation:

The Statute of Frauds is a law that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the parties involved in the contract. The purpose of this law is to prevent fraud and other harm.

Some of the most common types of contracts that fall under the Statute of Frauds include:

  • Contracts that involve the sale or transfer of land
  • Contracts that cannot be completed within one year

For example, if you were buying a house, the contract would need to be in writing and signed by both you and the seller. This is to prevent any fraudulent activity from taking place. Another example would be if you were entering into a contract that would take longer than a year to complete, such as a five-year lease agreement. This contract would also need to be in writing and signed by both parties.

The Statute of Frauds is an important law that helps protect individuals from fraudulent activity and ensures that contracts are legally binding.

statute | Statute of limitations

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.