Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

statute of mortmain

Read a random definition: valere seipsum

A quick definition of statute of mortmain:

Statute of Mortmain: A law that limits the amount of land that corporations, especially charitable ones, can receive as gifts or hold in perpetuity. In England, this law required the Crown's authorization before land could be given to religious corporations. The purpose was to prevent lands from being held by religious corporations forever. Although this law is not generally part of the common law in the United States, it influenced the enactment of certain state laws restricting the amount of property that a corporation could hold for religious or charitable purposes.

A more thorough explanation:

The Statute of Mortmain, also known as the Mortmain Statute, is a law that limits gifts and other dispositions of land to corporations, especially charitable ones. It also prohibits corporations from holding land in perpetuity.

In England, laws such as the Provisions of Westminster and Magna Carta required the Crown's authorization before land could vest in a corporation. The purpose was to prevent lands from being held by religious corporations in perpetuity. This type of restriction was not generally part of the common law in the United States, but it influenced the enactment of certain state laws restricting the amount of property that a corporation could hold for religious or charitable purposes.

For example, a wealthy individual may want to donate a piece of land to a charity. However, the Statute of Mortmain would prevent the charity from holding onto the land forever. Instead, the charity would have to sell the land or transfer it to another entity after a certain period of time.

Statute of Monopolies | Statute of Uses

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.