Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

statutory double-patenting rejection

Read a random definition: brevia anticipantia

A quick definition of statutory double-patenting rejection:

A statutory double-patenting rejection is when someone tries to get a patent for something that's already been patented by them before. This means they can't get another patent for the same thing. It's like trying to get two stickers for the same picture - you can only have one!

A more thorough explanation:

A statutory double-patenting rejection is a finding by a patent examiner that a patent application is unpatentable because it covers the same invention as an already-patented invention by the same inventor. This type of rejection is based on 35 USCA § 101.

For example, if an inventor applies for a patent on a new type of phone charger, but they already have a patent on a similar phone charger, the patent examiner may issue a statutory double-patenting rejection.

This type of rejection is meant to prevent inventors from obtaining multiple patents on the same invention, which would give them an unfair advantage over competitors and stifle innovation.

statutory double patenting | statutory employee

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
but again, that's my perspective as a native New Yorker, I personally couldn't do it
starfishies
18:26
underrated school imo but I’ve gushed about them here enough 🤧
[] c0bra1
18:33
if they had more info on their ip law stuff i might've deposited there but i couldn't find much
[] c0bra1
18:35
lexington was the major turn off though i think i would go insane if i lived in a town that was like 4 streets long 💀
c0bra, that's what im saying... i was like hunny what is dis........
put your shoes on lets go find u a HOME
I'm from buttfuck midwest I will survive
Also @starfishies I would talk to u more about w&l if u wanted :)
[] c0bra1
18:41
you got a nice scholarship too @JupitersMoons
yeah, money talks and we broke as hell over here
starfishies
18:44
ill never pass up the opportunity
starfishies
18:44
guys W&L would’ve been my vibes pick
starfishies
18:45
Lexington = lock-in-ton
starfishies
18:45
get that gpa get that job get that money get out
that's the goallllll
also their Big Law % is High and places a ton in NYC and DC so like if u want NYC/DC then....
My cycle is officially OVER
we done, boysssss
[] c0bra1
20:04
@IrishDinosaur: congrats
21:01
@IrishDinosaur: AWESOME!
21:02
Curious on W&L if anyone can share their insights. lock-in-ton seems quite attractive as someone from BFE.
starfishies
21:30
they should sponsor me
21:50
@IrishDinosaur: upenn or money?
upenn son or ucla daughter?
MeowPossibilities
22:58
guys if a scholarshpi tab randomly popped up on status checker does that mean nothing or
Butt-Breaker-9
23:43
@windyMagician: UCLA daughter. 100%.
do law schools care about course rigor?
@AcceptableSourGerbil: not really. It's a soft at best. Sadly, LSAC GPA and LSAT are by far the biggest gatekeepers
@AcceptableSourGerbil: you have solid stats though, you should be very proud!
Based on my experience, I don't think most schools care too much about course rigor unfortunately. It might push you over the edge to an A, but it won't get your foot in the door.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.