Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sunset law

Read a random definition: Investor Protection Guide: Ponzi Scheme

A quick definition of sunset law:

A sunset law is a rule that says if a government program or law doesn't get approved by lawmakers after a certain amount of time, it will automatically end. For example, if a state makes a program to help prisoners with drug problems, the program might have to be reviewed and approved every two years or it will stop. This law was made to make sure the government doesn't waste time and money on things that don't work well.

A more thorough explanation:

A sunset law, also called a sunset provision, is a law that automatically ends an agency, law, or government program if it doesn't get approval from lawmakers within a certain amount of time.

For example, let's say a state creates a program to help prisoners with drug addiction. The law that created the program might say that it will end in two years if lawmakers don't review and approve it. This is to make sure that the program is still needed and working well.

The sunset law was made in the 1970s in the United States to make government more efficient. It makes lawmakers look at the programs they've created and decide if they're still necessary.

Another example of a sunset law is the Patriot Act. This law was passed after the 9/11 attacks to help prevent terrorism. But it had a sunset provision that made it expire after a certain amount of time. This was to make sure that lawmakers would review it and decide if it was still needed.

The examples show how sunset laws work. They make sure that lawmakers review programs and laws to make sure they're still needed and working well. If they're not, the program or law will end.

Summons | sunshine laws

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.