Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

trade embargo

Read a random definition: attached

A quick definition of trade embargo:

A trade embargo is when a government stops trading with another country as a way to punish them for doing something wrong. It means that no goods can be bought or sold between the two countries. This can happen during times of war or peace. If the embargo leads to war, the ships of the other country are captured. If it leads to peace, the ships are returned.

A more thorough explanation:

A trade embargo is a government's decision to stop or restrict trade with another country. This can happen during wartime or peacetime. It means that the government will not allow private ships from the other country to enter its ports.

For example, during the Cold War, the United States imposed a trade embargo on Cuba. This meant that American companies could not do business with Cuba, and Cuban ships were not allowed to enter American ports.

Another example is when the United Nations imposed a trade embargo on Iraq in 1990. This was in response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The embargo meant that Iraq could not sell its oil to other countries, and other countries could not sell goods to Iraq.

These examples illustrate how a trade embargo can be used as a political tool to put pressure on another country. It can be a way to show disapproval of a country's actions or to try to force them to change their behavior.

trade draft | trade gap

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:05
haha keepin poor ppl poor, havent seen that one b4
16:06
Yeah just apply anyway, ur chances are 1% but we want ur app!
I think I'm cooked this cycle honestly
16:06
wen apply?
me suddenly getting two emails but them both being about my credit card due payment is actually a crime
already applied for a 1 year masters at my school so I can apply next cycle
MrThickRopes
16:07
fo pm ain't shit
MrThickRopes
16:07
fo pm next week gon be a movie tho
fo pm next thursday will be insane work
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:07
@hcarralero2005: do you think there's a chance either your essays or your LORs weren't strong?
16:07
@MrThickRopes: Thicky lessgo bar hop till next fo pm
@hcarralero2005: tbh work experience would be dope for your app
Both of my essays were quite strong, and my LORs are great too
I also have a great resume with 2 internships in public interest law
16:08
@hcarralero2005: when did u apply
and now I notified schools of another one coming up
also have URM
February
internship dont really county as work experience
i think with a year of relevant work experience and applying early you get wayyyy better results
MrThickRopes
16:10
@llama: yeeeeeeee
MrThickRopes
16:10
we gotta go to da club
16:11
@MrThickRopes: Bar hop for some sparkling waters on the rocks, then hit up Sam's Club .Lessgo
babycakes
16:12
I wanna go to the club
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:12
Echoing what others have said-- if you're confident your essays and LORs were strong, you probably did just apply too late. All those WLs mean you meet their requirements for admission, and they just chose others over you (maybe because of timing, maybe because of now WE)
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:12
*no
MrThickRopes
16:13
lesss GOOOo
Yeah I applied in February, and while I was lucky enough to get into three schools (one of my targets) - I attribute it to a solid LSAT score in January, the application cycle would have looked a lot different if I had gotten my shit together and applied earlier
My family won't accept me not being in college, even if it's to get relevant work experience, they think the moment I start working I'll give up wanting to go to law school, which is why I'm choosing masters
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
16:13
I also applied too late and I feel like an idiot for not having insider knowledge that 1-2 months early = late
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.