Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

unus nullus rule

Read a random definition: military government

A quick definition of unus nullus rule:

The unus nullus rule is a legal principle that says the testimony of only one witness is not enough to prove something. This means that if only one person says something happened, it may not be considered true in court. It's like when you play a game and someone says they saw something happen, but no one else did, so you're not sure if it really happened or not. In civil law, if someone fails to fulfill a duty to another person, they may not be entitled to inherit from them, which is called being unworthy.

A more thorough explanation:

The unus nullus rule is a legal principle in civil law that states the testimony of only one witness is not considered reliable evidence. The term comes from the Latin phrase "one is nobody" and is also known as the "one witness rule."

For example, in a court case, if only one witness testifies about an event, their testimony may not be enough to prove the case. The court may require additional evidence or testimony from other witnesses to corroborate the story.

Another example is in the case of an unvalued insurance policy. An unvalued policy is one where the value of the insured item is not determined until a loss occurs. If only one witness testifies about the value of the item, their testimony may not be enough to determine the value of the loss.

The unus nullus rule is in place to ensure that evidence presented in court is reliable and accurate. It prevents false or misleading testimony from being used to make important legal decisions.

unum quid | unwritten constitution

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.