Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

USERRA (The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act)

Read a random definition: blue note

A quick definition of USERRA (The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act):

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) is a law that protects military members from being treated unfairly by their employers because of their military service. It also requires employers to give their employees their jobs back when they return from military service. This law helps make sure that military members are treated fairly and can keep their jobs when they serve our country.

A more thorough explanation:

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) is a law that protects military members from discrimination by their employers for their military participation. It also requires employers to rehire some employees who become deployed.

USERRA’s main purpose is to prevent employers from discriminating against military employees. This means that employers cannot fire them, keep them from getting promotions, or make their job more difficult than others in similar roles. If an employer takes any discriminatory action against a military employee, it will be considered a violation of the Act if the military service was a “motivating factor” of the action.

For example, if an employer fires an employee because they are in the military, that would be a violation of USERRA.

Employees who experience discrimination may have different remedies, such as an injunction against being fired for a period of time or monetary damages. Most claims are informally resolved through the Secretary of Labor, but employees may bring a claim in court themselves or potentially through arbitration.

Another important provision of USERRA requires employers to rehire most veterans after they return from service. The employee must be rehired at a position and pay equal to what they had before they left. This means some employers must rehire the employees on better terms than they left.

For example, if an employee was making $50,000 a year before they left for military service and the company gave raises while they were gone, the employee must be rehired at the new salary.

To qualify for this treatment, a veteran must have given the employer proper notice of future uniformed service and must start employment again soon after finishing service. This does not apply for employees who are in uniformed services for less than 32 days. Those who are in service for 32-180 cannot be fired by the employer after returning for at least 180 days with certain exceptions and a year for those that are in service for more than 180 days.

For example, if an employee is in the military for 6 months, they cannot be fired by their employer for at least a year after they return.

There are exceptions that may disqualify an employee. An employee cannot be in service more than five years with the same employer and still be guaranteed employment after service. Further, an employer may not have to rehire an employee when they can prove that rehiring is no longer possible because of changes in the business or major financial difficulties prevent them doing so.

For example, if a company goes out of business while an employee is in the military, the employer cannot rehire them because the job no longer exists.

The standard for this exception is unclear but essentially requires the reemployment to be highly impractical for the employer.

usefulness | USPTO

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.