Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

uti possidetis juris

Read a random definition: court reporter

A quick definition of uti possidetis juris:

Uti possidetis juris (UPJ) is a rule that helps keep the borders of new countries the same as they were when they were colonies. This is important because it prevents fights between new countries over who gets what land. It was first used in Latin America when colonies became independent countries, but now it is used in other places too. The idea is to make sure that new countries can be stable and independent without fighting over land.

A more thorough explanation:

Uti possidetis juris (UPJ) is a principle of customary international law that helps to maintain the boundaries of colonies that become independent states. This principle was first used to establish the borders of newly independent territories in Latin America, but it is now used in other parts of the world, especially in Africa.

The purpose of UPJ is to prevent conflicts over borders that could threaten the stability of new states. When a colony becomes independent, UPJ ensures that the borders established by the former colonial power are respected. This helps to prevent disputes over land and resources that could lead to violence.

For example, when Spain gave up control of its colonies in Latin America, UPJ was used to establish the borders of the new states. This prevented other countries from trying to claim land that had been assigned to one of the new states.

Another example is the case of Burkina Faso and Mali. In 1986, the International Court of Justice used UPJ to settle a dispute over their border. The court ruled that the border should be based on the borders that had been established by the former colonial power, France.

Overall, UPJ is an important principle that helps to maintain peace and stability in newly independent states. By respecting the borders established by the former colonial power, UPJ helps to prevent conflicts over land and resources.

Utah | Utilities and transportation - State statutes

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dont agree dkk but out of messages so this is a talk for another day
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.