Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

veil-piercing

Read a random definition: permutation

A quick definition of veil-piercing:

Veil-piercing is when a court holds people who own or run a company responsible for the company's bad actions. Normally, these people are protected from being personally responsible for what the company does. But if the court thinks they did something wrong, they can be held responsible. This is also called disregarding the corporate entity. It can be hard to predict when this will happen because there isn't a clear rule for it.

A more thorough explanation:

Veil-piercing is a legal term that refers to the act of holding corporate officers, directors, and shareholders personally liable for the wrongful acts of a corporation. This is done by disregarding the legal separation between the corporation and its owners, which is known as the corporate veil.

For example, if a corporation is sued for breach of contract and it is found that the owners of the corporation used it as a personal piggy bank, the court may decide to pierce the corporate veil and hold the owners personally liable for the damages.

Another example would be if a corporation is found to have engaged in fraudulent activities, and it is determined that the owners were aware of and participated in the fraud. In this case, the court may also decide to pierce the corporate veil and hold the owners personally liable for the damages.

Overall, veil-piercing is a legal tool that is used to prevent individuals from using the corporate form to shield themselves from personal liability for wrongful acts committed through the corporation.

vehicular | vein

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.