Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vexatious litigant

Read a random definition: legislative immunity

A quick definition of vexatious litigant:

A vexatious litigant is someone who keeps filing lawsuits that are not serious or important. This can be a problem because it wastes time and money for everyone involved. Some places have rules that say a vexatious litigant needs permission from a judge before they can file any more lawsuits.

A more thorough explanation:

A vexatious litigant is someone who repeatedly files frivolous lawsuits. This means that they file lawsuits that have no legal basis or merit, and are often done to harass or annoy the other party.

Many jurisdictions have laws or rules that require a vexatious litigant to get permission from the court before filing any further lawsuits or legal documents. This is to prevent them from wasting the court's time and resources, as well as the time and resources of the other party.

  • John has filed five lawsuits against his former employer, all of which have been dismissed by the court. The court has now declared him a vexatious litigant and he must get permission before filing any further lawsuits.
  • Sarah has filed multiple lawsuits against her neighbor for trivial matters, such as the color of their house or the type of plants in their garden. The court has deemed her a vexatious litigant and she must get permission before filing any further lawsuits.

These examples illustrate how a vexatious litigant repeatedly files lawsuits that have no legal basis or merit, causing unnecessary burden on the court and the other party.

vexatious lawsuit | vexatious proceeding

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.