Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vexatious litigant

Read a random definition: choice of jurisdiction

A quick definition of vexatious litigant:

A vexatious litigant is someone who keeps filing lawsuits that are not serious or important. This can be a problem because it wastes time and money for everyone involved. Some places have rules that say a vexatious litigant needs permission from a judge before they can file any more lawsuits.

A more thorough explanation:

A vexatious litigant is someone who repeatedly files frivolous lawsuits. This means that they file lawsuits that have no legal basis or merit, and are often done to harass or annoy the other party.

Many jurisdictions have laws or rules that require a vexatious litigant to get permission from the court before filing any further lawsuits or legal documents. This is to prevent them from wasting the court's time and resources, as well as the time and resources of the other party.

  • John has filed five lawsuits against his former employer, all of which have been dismissed by the court. The court has now declared him a vexatious litigant and he must get permission before filing any further lawsuits.
  • Sarah has filed multiple lawsuits against her neighbor for trivial matters, such as the color of their house or the type of plants in their garden. The court has deemed her a vexatious litigant and she must get permission before filing any further lawsuits.

These examples illustrate how a vexatious litigant repeatedly files lawsuits that have no legal basis or merit, causing unnecessary burden on the court and the other party.

vexatious lawsuit | vexatious proceeding

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
15:38
Isn’t uchicago like Top 4 tho
choosingpeace
15:38
@cumsock: they said there's like nothing to do there lol
choosingpeace
15:38
ive never been so i was just like ohhh
texaslawhopefully
15:38
UChicago is number one
^ period
u know it was a double thing. I missed II and my gf didn't want to live in the midwest anymore
15:39
But it’s fucking uchicago thooo LOL
15:39
I
15:40
Makes sense tho
cumsock
15:40
@choosingpeace: there’s plenty to do in Philly 😂 it’s a giant city
So after missing the II, I was like whatever. Maybe it's a sign to withdraw
nah making decisions off the gf is out of pocket
nahhhhh we been together since 10th grade
texaslawhopefully
15:40
I guess it depends what your goals are. If it's generic biglaw, CLS will get you the same outcome
6 yrs on January 30th
lilypadfrog
15:40
awwww <3 i love love
I also like CLS for liberal clerking. approx 41 FCOA clerks per yr
It's there if I excel. if not then I'm chill with sticking to BL
texaslawhopefully
15:41
CLS is not even close to Chicago for clerking lmao
choosingpeace
15:41
wait would yall pick CLS or penn?
I didn't apply to either but I would pick penn
15:42
penn bc im in state
no no it's not. But I wouldn't clerk conservative, so idk about Chi #s for myself
cumsock
15:42
Penn
texaslawhopefully
15:42
I guess that's fair. From what I've heard UChicago for conservatives is on par w/ HYS for clerkships
texaslawhopefully
15:42
not sure about for liberals
cumsock
15:43
They’re very similar tho
cumsock
15:43
Both t6 ivies
Is that NYU disrespect???? NYU out the t-6?
15:44
Penn because my college friends who mentored me go there
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.