Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Vexatious litigation

Read a random definition: danelaw

A quick definition of Vexatious litigation:

Definition: Vexatious litigation is when someone starts a lawsuit just to bother or embarrass the other person, even though they know they don't have a good reason to sue. It's like playing a mean trick on someone and making them spend a lot of money on lawyers for no good reason. If someone does this, the person they sued can try to get justice by filing a claim for malicious prosecution.

A more thorough explanation:

Vexatious litigation

Vexatious litigation is when someone starts a legal case without a good reason, just to bother or cause trouble for the other person. The person starting the case knows or should know that they don't have a good case. This can cause the other person to spend a lot of money on legal fees. If someone is a victim of vexatious litigation, they can file a claim for malicious prosecution.

Example 1: John is angry at his neighbor, Sarah, for playing loud music at night. Instead of talking to her about it, he decides to sue her for noise pollution, even though he knows that the music is not that loud. This is an example of vexatious litigation because John is starting a legal case without a good reason, just to bother Sarah.

Example 2: Mary is a business owner who is being sued by a former employee for wrongful termination. The employee knows that they were fired for a good reason, but they are still suing Mary just to cause trouble for her. This is an example of vexatious litigation because the employee is starting a legal case without a good reason, just to bother Mary.

These examples illustrate how vexatious litigation is started with malicious intent and without a good case. The person starting the case knows or should know that they don't have a good reason to sue, but they do it anyway to cause trouble for the other person. This can be very unfair and costly for the victim of vexatious litigation.

Veto | Vicarious Infringement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.