Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vir

Read a random definition: college

A quick definition of vir:

Term: VIR

Definition: A vir is a grown-up man or a husband. In old Latin phrases used in English law, vir usually means "husband," like in the phrase "husband and wife." It is similar to the term "et vir."

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Vir (veer) is a Latin word that means an adult male or a man. It can also mean a husband. In English law, it is often used to refer to a husband in phrases like "vir et uxor" (husband and wife).

  • "He is a vir who takes care of his family."
  • "The vir and uxor were married for 50 years."

The first example uses "vir" to mean an adult male or a man. The second example uses "vir" in the Latin phrase "vir et uxor" to mean a husband.

violent profits | vires

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
hi guys
1a2b3c4d26z
13:43
What does everyone want for christmas
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
an A from UCI
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
with lotsssss of scholarship!
a lobotomy
soap
13:45
M̶i̶c̶h̶i̶g̶a̶n̶ ̶A a good Christmas dinner
13:46
Blowjobs
13:47
Extra sucky style
ED --> RD at CLS Waitlist at Fordham below both medians at both. Should i be hopeful for next cycle if i retake my LSAT and get my score up? no hard rejections so far, has to mean something right? LOL im going crazy
higher lsat makes everything way easier
but the fact that both schools didn’t R you means that you’re at least a competitive applicant
jackfrost11770
13:49
HI WASPY :)
probably my WE and softs. Do reapplicants have lower chances at admissions? I've read few negative things but I dont wanna like poison my brain with those lol.
Also, do i have to write new personal statements if i reapply?
hi jack :)
calling dean cooper as we speak to get you an A
you do have to write new personal statements but applicants aren’t disfavored
especially if you’re reapplying with a higher lsat
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: i just looked at your stats and do not take this the wrong way in any way but how the hell did nyu or cls not take you. this is insane
178 lsat is a crazy work dude
i had a silly guy era and had two years of withdrawn classes. like 15 total, so a lot of schools were not willing to take a chance on me
soap
13:55
If you're already on the WL when you get a higher LSAT, are you already cooked?
their loss lol. any tips for LSAT LR? I used 7sage and kinda hated it. I have Loophole that I plan on using whenever I retake lsat probably in summer
@soap: you are more cooked than if you were not already waitlisted, but you are not completely cooked and raising your lsat is the strongest thing you can do for a WL
soap
13:58
Volatile, I always do the hardest ones first, so that you get the most challenging questions out of the way and make it get easier as you proceed. Also, read the answer choices before reading the question.
soap
13:58
Man if I get above 175 and end up not getting into any t14s I'll laugh
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: biggest tip that will get you a few points is that the LSAT doesn’t actually use “most correct” like it claims. there’s actually only ever one right answer and every other answer will be excluded by one rule of logic or another. so only one answer will ever be completely correct
is there like a cheat sheet or a study guide type of thing for specific forms of questions? I remember I struggled the most with NA/SA/PSA
@soap: if you get above a 175 you should just reapply because you’d probably be competitive for penn nyu and cls at that point with scholly money
I scored 156 on my first LSAT in August, I cancelled that and retook it immediately in September and got 163. Do yall think I can cross into 170's if I start studying from like january to summer
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.