Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

volenti non fit injuria

Read a random definition: weighage

A quick definition of volenti non fit injuria:

Volenti non fit injuria is a fancy way of saying that if someone willingly puts themselves in danger, they can't complain if they get hurt. This means that if you know something is risky and you still choose to do it, you can't blame anyone else if you get hurt. It's like if you decide to climb a tall tree even though you know it's dangerous, you can't sue someone if you fall and get hurt.

A more thorough explanation:

Volenti non fit injuria

Volenti non fit injuria is a legal principle that means "to a willing person, it is not a wrong." This means that if someone willingly puts themselves in a dangerous situation, they cannot sue for any resulting injuries. This principle is the basis for the assumption of the risk doctrine.

For example, if someone decides to go bungee jumping, they are willingly putting themselves in a dangerous situation. If they get injured during the jump, they cannot sue the bungee jumping company for their injuries because they knew the risks and willingly took them.

Another example is if someone decides to play a contact sport like football. If they get injured during the game, they cannot sue the other players or the league because they knew the risks of playing a contact sport and willingly took those risks.

The examples illustrate the principle of volenti non fit injuria because in both cases, the person willingly put themselves in a dangerous situation. They knew the risks and chose to take them anyway. Because of this, they cannot sue for any resulting injuries because they were aware of the risks and chose to take them.

Volcker Rule | Voluntary

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
but again, that's my perspective as a native New Yorker, I personally couldn't do it
starfishies
18:26
underrated school imo but I’ve gushed about them here enough 🤧
[] c0bra1
18:33
if they had more info on their ip law stuff i might've deposited there but i couldn't find much
[] c0bra1
18:35
lexington was the major turn off though i think i would go insane if i lived in a town that was like 4 streets long 💀
c0bra, that's what im saying... i was like hunny what is dis........
put your shoes on lets go find u a HOME
I'm from buttfuck midwest I will survive
Also @starfishies I would talk to u more about w&l if u wanted :)
[] c0bra1
18:41
you got a nice scholarship too @JupitersMoons
yeah, money talks and we broke as hell over here
starfishies
18:44
ill never pass up the opportunity
starfishies
18:44
guys W&L would’ve been my vibes pick
starfishies
18:45
Lexington = lock-in-ton
starfishies
18:45
get that gpa get that job get that money get out
that's the goallllll
also their Big Law % is High and places a ton in NYC and DC so like if u want NYC/DC then....
My cycle is officially OVER
we done, boysssss
[] c0bra1
20:04
@IrishDinosaur: congrats
21:01
@IrishDinosaur: AWESOME!
21:02
Curious on W&L if anyone can share their insights. lock-in-ton seems quite attractive as someone from BFE.
starfishies
21:30
they should sponsor me
21:50
@IrishDinosaur: upenn or money?
upenn son or ucla daughter?
MeowPossibilities
22:58
guys if a scholarshpi tab randomly popped up on status checker does that mean nothing or
Butt-Breaker-9
23:43
@windyMagician: UCLA daughter. 100%.
do law schools care about course rigor?
@AcceptableSourGerbil: not really. It's a soft at best. Sadly, LSAC GPA and LSAT are by far the biggest gatekeepers
@AcceptableSourGerbil: you have solid stats though, you should be very proud!
Based on my experience, I don't think most schools care too much about course rigor unfortunately. It might push you over the edge to an A, but it won't get your foot in the door.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.