Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

War Powers

Read a random definition: counteraffidavit

A quick definition of War Powers:

War Powers refer to the authority given to the President and Congress in the United States Constitution to make decisions about military operations. Congress has the power to declare war, while the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. However, there has been debate about how much power the President has to use the military without Congressional approval. The War Powers Resolution was passed in 1973 to limit the President's power, but it has not been very effective. The Supreme Court has also been involved in cases related to war powers, such as the detention of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. In times of national emergency, Presidents have claimed additional powers, but the extent of these powers has been disputed.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: War Powers refer to the powers granted to the President and Congress by the U.S. Constitution to declare and direct military operations. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, while Article II, Section 2 names the President as the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. However, throughout history, Presidents have often engaged in military operations without express Congressional consent.

Examples: Examples of military operations conducted without Congressional approval include the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, the Afghanistan War of 2001, and the Iraq War of 2002.

Explanation: These examples illustrate how the President has sometimes used military force without seeking approval from Congress. This has led to debates about the extent of the President's power to direct military operations without Congressional consent. In response to this issue, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in 1973, which requires the President to communicate to Congress the committal of troops within 48 hours and remove all troops after 60 days if Congress has not granted an extension. However, this resolution has not been as effective as Congress intended, and the issue of war powers continues to be a source of conflict and debate.

Additionally, the Supreme Court has addressed the issue of war powers in cases such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which dealt with the detention of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. These cases illustrate how the Court has interpreted the Constitution's allocation of war powers between the President and Congress, and how the Court has sought to ensure that detainees receive proper procedural safeguards to ensure fair trials and the ability to ascertain the nature of the charges against them.

Overall, the issue of war powers is complex and continues to be a source of debate and conflict between the President and Congress.

War crime | Ward

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.