Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

War Powers

Read a random definition: common at large

A quick definition of War Powers:

War Powers refer to the authority given to the President and Congress in the United States Constitution to make decisions about military operations. Congress has the power to declare war, while the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. However, there has been debate about how much power the President has to use the military without Congressional approval. The War Powers Resolution was passed in 1973 to limit the President's power, but it has not been very effective. The Supreme Court has also been involved in cases related to war powers, such as the detention of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. In times of national emergency, Presidents have claimed additional powers, but the extent of these powers has been disputed.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: War Powers refer to the powers granted to the President and Congress by the U.S. Constitution to declare and direct military operations. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, while Article II, Section 2 names the President as the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. However, throughout history, Presidents have often engaged in military operations without express Congressional consent.

Examples: Examples of military operations conducted without Congressional approval include the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, the Afghanistan War of 2001, and the Iraq War of 2002.

Explanation: These examples illustrate how the President has sometimes used military force without seeking approval from Congress. This has led to debates about the extent of the President's power to direct military operations without Congressional consent. In response to this issue, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in 1973, which requires the President to communicate to Congress the committal of troops within 48 hours and remove all troops after 60 days if Congress has not granted an extension. However, this resolution has not been as effective as Congress intended, and the issue of war powers continues to be a source of conflict and debate.

Additionally, the Supreme Court has addressed the issue of war powers in cases such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which dealt with the detention of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. These cases illustrate how the Court has interpreted the Constitution's allocation of war powers between the President and Congress, and how the Court has sought to ensure that detainees receive proper procedural safeguards to ensure fair trials and the ability to ascertain the nature of the charges against them.

Overall, the issue of war powers is complex and continues to be a source of debate and conflict between the President and Congress.

War crime | Ward

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
15:23
what if I started flexing again
15:24
that might be too much
15:33
can we see ur mod badge?
15:41
just for u sweetie pie
15:43
woah so much swagger with dat 'm;
Dkk
15:47
@shaquilleoatmeal: more like, blow my back out by the bay boston instead of back bay boston.
Dkk
15:48
Indeed, the legendary man himself.
15:49
I would go to blow my back out by the bay boston
15:50
lift with ur back not your legs, its better to have a blown back than two bad legs
CynicalOops
15:53
Blow and back day out by boston bay
15:59
so true
Dkk
16:03
Of course. Man sad Ricky Henderson died. That was my favorite athlete of all time.
windyMagician
16:10
is it dumb that I rlly want to go to Mich even tho I have a full ride to umn
16:12
no-value as a consumer often means more than the price
Dkk
16:15
@windyMagician: Nah michigan is better than UMN
Dkk
16:15
My sister just officially graduated, yay!
16:16
awesome @Dkks sister
16:16
prolly named veronica or sarah
windyMagician
16:16
@Dkk: for public defense tho?
windyMagician
16:16
Sarah in the bathroom
texaslawhopefully
16:17
@windyMagician: not at all. Michigan is also very generous with aid, so if you get enough it makes perfect sense to take it.
windyMagician
16:17
fuck okay
windyMagician
16:17
going to my dream school is crazy
michigan also has better options if you do PD for 10 years then want to do something else
windyMagician
16:19
also would love to clerk for my federal district court even tho I know its hella competitive, I think mich sets me up better?
16:20
would be a great point to bring up when ur deciding / visiting each place- see what recent placement looks like
texaslawhopefully
16:23
For fed clerkships by far Michigan places better. I think it’s like 14-15 percent
windyMagician
16:25
sticker debt is high-key scary tho
texaslawhopefully
16:26
I’m sure you’ll get good merit aid though. Look at Michigan’s 509 report. They’re very generous.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.