Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

war-powers resolution

Read a random definition: non compos mentis

A quick definition of war-powers resolution:

The War-Powers Resolution is a rule made by Congress in 1973 that limits the President's power to start a war without permission from Congress, unless the United States or one of its territories is attacked. This means that the President cannot just decide to go to war on their own, they need to get approval from Congress first.

A more thorough explanation:

The War-Powers Resolution is a law passed by the United States Congress in 1973. It limits the power of the President to involve the country in foreign conflicts without the approval of Congress, unless the United States or one of its territories is attacked.

For example, if the President wanted to send troops to another country to fight a war, he would need to get approval from Congress first. This law was passed to prevent the President from making decisions about war without the input of the people's representatives in Congress.

The War-Powers Resolution was passed over the President's veto, which means that the President did not agree with the law but Congress passed it anyway. This law is important because it helps to ensure that the United States does not get involved in unnecessary wars without the approval of the people's representatives in Congress.

war power | warrandice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.