Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Warsaw Convention

Read a random definition: return of writ

A quick definition of Warsaw Convention:

The Warsaw Convention is a set of rules that were made in 1929 to help people who get hurt or die while traveling on an airplane. If something bad happens to a passenger on a plane, the airline is responsible for paying money to help them. The most the airline has to pay is 125,000 francs, unless they agree to pay more or did something really bad on purpose. People have two years to ask for this money, and if the airline did everything they were supposed to do, they don't have to pay anything.

A more thorough explanation:

The Warsaw Convention is an international treaty that was negotiated in Warsaw, Poland in 1929. It consists of a set of rules that govern claims made for personal injuries that occur during international air travel. The United States is a party to this treaty.

Under the Warsaw Convention, airlines are held responsible for accidents that occur on board the aircraft or during the process of embarking or disembarking. The airline is liable for up to a preset monetary ceiling for any bodily injury or death suffered by a passenger. The Convention limits the liability of the carrier for each passenger to the sum of 125,000 francs, unless the carrier and passenger agree to a higher limit of liability. However, if it can be established that the carrier has been guilty of 'willful misconduct,' the carrier may be held liable for more than the preset limit.

The Convention also contains a two-year time limitation for bringing a lawsuit, and absolves the carrier from liability if it can be shown that the carrier exercised due care.

For example, if a passenger is injured during a flight from New York to Paris, the airline may be held liable for the passenger's injuries under the Warsaw Convention. However, if the airline can prove that it exercised due care and was not guilty of willful misconduct, it may not be held liable for the passenger's injuries.

war-risk insurance | warship

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
babycat
15:01
@Dkk: what if it’s someone you’ve known for a long time but never dated?
Dkk
15:03
Maybe but things would have to go like perfectly. I could not imagine them going perfectly.
15:04
Sleeping on the first date just isn't my style, idk. I take things painfully slowly and much prefer to befriend and really get to know a girl first before doing any of that
Ok another question, what do u tell the ppl u sleeping with already that ur going on dates
Dkk
15:05
The bigger issue is if I sleep with them will I have the emotional connection to finish cus it is harder for me to finish if I do not know the person.
bigroger100
15:05
Anyways when the fuck are either of the colorados schools releasing their shit. Smh
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
15:05
@Rightfullytherlauren: If the person is clean or has a good vibe I will do it the first date
15:06
Yeah sorry I can't answer that Lauren, I don't sleep with anyone if I'm not already dating them
Dkk
15:06
@Rightfullytherlauren: This is like a stupid thing that only really hot guys and women have to think about. I have never had to think about this before. No answer.
Dkk
15:07
@bigroger100: No idea. Probably when they released last year unless they were supposed to release already.
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
15:08
@Rightfullytherlauren: I am apparently a hot guy or just a slut cause I have had this before. If it is a FWB then you gotta follow the rules on that like wrapping your tool and such but if it is a casual fuck/bootie call they do not need to know if you are trying to find love and what you are doing when you are busy
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
15:09
You just have to be smart and accept your choices, I know some people will believe a casual hook up or FWB is a regular exclusive thing. Communication is key if you are playing it that way but it is very dangerous to have multiple partners at the same time in a non-exclusive way
babycat
15:09
Yeah you should make it clear to them it's not exclusive
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
15:10
I have been on the receiving/hurt end thinking it was exclusive when I was just her human dildo and it makes you feel bad.
babycat
15:11
Aw poor Bulbasaur
Dkk
15:11
In all of these situations described, the point of failure happened way before the emotional reality set in.
babycat
15:11
I'm like extremely monogamous at heart
babycat
15:12
I'm never dating or fucking more than one person at a time
babycat
15:12
But one time this guy I'd been dating for a little bit had a tinder notification come up on his phone and I flipped my shit lol
1a2b3c4d26z
15:12
Yea but isn't that just cheating
1a2b3c4d26z
15:12
If you're already dating
babycat
15:13
I mean like casual dating without a label
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
15:13
My wife and I date girls together but we don't fuck unless it is going to be exclusive but having hot chick friends you can flirt with is great.
babycat
15:13
I also have hot chick friends I can flirt with
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
15:13
@babycat: Tinder spams marketing messages so dude probably forgot to delete but either way he didn't deserve you so fuck him
babycat
15:14
That was actually it but I was mean to him for like two days about it anyways
Dkk
15:14
Yeah, I am going to bed. I am starting to feel tired. Goodnight.
15:14
Goodnight DK
Dkk
15:14
Thank you. Goodnight to you too.
babycat
15:14
don't let the bedbugs bite
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.