Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

website-user agreement

Read a random definition: tax return

A quick definition of website-user agreement:

A website-user agreement, also known as a point-and-click agreement or click-wrap license, is an electronic agreement that a user accepts by clicking on a specific location on the screen. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions of using a website or software and may include a clause for ongoing acceptance of any changes to the agreement. It is similar to a shrink-wrap license, but in an electronic format.

A more thorough explanation:

A website-user agreement is a type of agreement that a user must agree to before using a website. It is also known as a point-and-click agreement or click-wrap agreement. This agreement is displayed electronically on the screen, and the user must click on a specific location to accept the terms of the agreement.

Once the user accepts the agreement, they are bound by its terms. The agreement may include a clause that requires the user to accept any changes to the agreement's terms, even if they are not notified of the changes.

For example, when you sign up for a social media account, you are presented with a website-user agreement. You must click on a specific location to accept the terms of the agreement before you can create an account. By accepting the agreement, you agree to the website's terms and conditions, including its privacy policy and community guidelines.

Another example is when you download software from a website. The website may require you to accept a website-user agreement before you can download the software. By accepting the agreement, you agree to the software's license terms and conditions.

Webb–Pomerene Act | web-wrap agreement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.