Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

West Australian plan

Read a random definition: lay impropriator

A quick definition of West Australian plan:

The act of voting is when people cast their choices to decide something. Sometimes, people can't go to the voting place on the day of the election, so they can vote by mail. There are different ways to vote, like choosing one candidate or ranking them in order of preference. Some voting systems give more weight to certain groups of people, like shareholders in a company. The West Australian plan, also known as instant-runoff voting, is a type of preferential voting where voters rank their choices and the candidate with the most votes wins.

A more thorough explanation:

The West Australian Plan is a type of voting system that falls under instant-runoff voting. Instant-runoff voting is a system of preferential voting that mimics a runoff election by using each voter's ranked preferences instead of a second round of voting. In the West Australian Plan, voters rank their preferred candidates, and the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated. The votes for the eliminated candidate are then redistributed to the remaining candidates based on the voters' second choice. This process continues until one candidate has a majority of the votes.

Suppose there are three candidates running for mayor: Candidate A, Candidate B, and Candidate C. There are 100 voters, and they rank the candidates in the following order:

  • 40 voters rank Candidate A as their first choice, Candidate B as their second choice, and Candidate C as their third choice.
  • 35 voters rank Candidate B as their first choice, Candidate C as their second choice, and Candidate A as their third choice.
  • 25 voters rank Candidate C as their first choice, Candidate A as their second choice, and Candidate B as their third choice.

In the first round of voting, Candidate C has the least number of votes (25), so they are eliminated. The votes for Candidate C are then redistributed to the remaining candidates based on the voters' second choice. Of the 25 voters who ranked Candidate C as their first choice, 15 ranked Candidate A as their second choice, and 10 ranked Candidate B as their second choice. After the redistribution of votes, Candidate A has 55 votes, and Candidate B has 45 votes. Since Candidate A has a majority of the votes, they are declared the winner.

wergild | Westlaw

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
18:36
It's all expected, and it's like if its predictable, how can I blame some idiot for marching on the capital. I mean, I almost went to that event.
I don’t think bashing dkk’s view is the right answer here. He’s an example of how dem messaging failed. Dems wanted to create a platform that represented minority groups (poc, lgbtq) while also benefiting the majority through housing plans, tax cuts on the middle class, and tax increases for the rich. For some reason, I think the messaging came off that the dem platform was focused only on the underrepresented groups.
18:38
Song absolutely slays
Trismegistus
18:38
my fellow nerds can we stop
texaslawhopefully
18:39
@ImpartialLion: I'm not bashing his view with regard to that the Dem's platform looked focused on the minority. My point is that Trump has zero respect for institutions, political norms, and the Constitution.
texaslawhopefully
18:39
All of which Trump has openly said
Looking forward, dems gotta improve the messaging. I think bernie did a good job of that by making the focus “the working class,” which goes beyond race or gender.
@texaslawhopefully: i dont disagree with those statements. I just think we have a lot to learn going into next election
texaslawhopefully
18:41
I mean my hope is the GOP gets wiped out in the midterms and has to recentralize its message
Dkk
18:41
I would say Texas is pretty nice here. I do think you got the right idea there though @impartialLion and maybe people can apply that to the broader context of why when someone just starts mischaracterizing me as a racist, homophobic, fatphobic, ableist for multiple days, I might just give up and start cussing at em lol. I mean, if someone did that to me in a bar I would get violent and I have been violent in the past with people. Being in bar fights is like an awesome experience and everyone should do it at least once.
Dkk
18:42
I try not to be violent these days cus every time I do assault someone or shove glass in someones face I clould go to jail but usually people are cool about it.
atwatodbit
18:42
hey guys this is a law school admissions website
ResponsibleCan1196
18:43
why are we YAPPING
Dkk
18:43
@texaslawhopefully: Yeah, I mean it could happen to the senate and house like it did to Obama but if he keeps his overall approval rating up, even if someone does not like individual policies it's compromise: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-approval-ratings-break-records-democrats-back-him-2018900
18:43
@atwat @can run along kids and go play with your toys. the adults are talking now.
i think this cycle is so slow that we have nothing better to do than tap
*yap my b
texaslawhopefully
18:45
@Dkk: Fair. My guess is (if the DNC is smart) dems change there messaging to be more appealing to moderates, they start winning and they hopefully that encourages republicans to move back to the center.
Dkk
18:47
Yeah, exactly.
18:47
i for one STILL cannot believe donnie is prez. like gobsmacked. how did that happen? was it getting gunned down that sealed the deal?
Im starting to worry that I wont hear back from some schools before deposit deadline. Anyone have any advice? Is it possible they push back deposit dates?
i really dont wanna lose that much money
texaslawhopefully
18:48
@llama: This was the best explanation that I read for it: https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning
18:48
@GapingVariousTurkey: same bro. im not worried cause yolo, but i think an honest talk with each applicable school will allow them to give leeway
texaslawhopefully
18:48
But, yeah, I think many people were shocked
any UK law students?
18:49
@texaslawhopefully: when I have some time i will read, thanks fren. Regardless of whichever of the two [T or H] are in the WH, I truly believe expectations will be looked back on as over worried.
18:50
@thanatologist: Kentucky?
texaslawhopefully
18:51
@llama: I don't know man, maybe I've been reading way too much news but I'm worried in a way I wasn't with Biden, or would've been with Harris
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.