Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

wet reckless

Read a random definition: virtual-representation doctrine

A quick definition of wet reckless:

Wet reckless is when someone who was caught driving under the influence (DUI) gets a deal to plead guilty to a lesser charge of reckless driving. This is called "wet" because it doesn't include the DUI part. Some states allow this, but others don't. People choose this option because they get a shorter sentence, lower fines, and may not lose their license. However, this option is usually only offered if there isn't much evidence or if the alcohol level was low. Some people think this is bad because innocent people might take the deal just to avoid a DUI charge.

A more thorough explanation:

Wet reckless is a term used when someone who is charged with driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs, pleads guilty to a lesser charge of reckless driving. The term "wet" refers to the fact that alcohol was involved in the original charge.

For example, if someone is pulled over for driving under the influence and their blood alcohol content (BAC) is just over the legal limit, they may be offered a plea bargain for a wet reckless charge instead of a DUI charge. This means they will be charged with reckless driving, but not with driving under the influence.

Wet reckless charges are not available in all states, and the details of the charge can vary depending on the state. In some states, like New York, wet reckless charges are not allowed. In other states, like California, wet reckless charges are allowed by law.

People may choose to accept a wet reckless charge because the penalties are usually less severe than those for a DUI charge. For example, the sentence may be shorter, the fines may be lower, and the person may not lose their driver's license. However, prosecutors usually only offer wet reckless plea bargains in cases where there is little evidence or the person's BAC is only slightly over the legal limit.

Some people criticize wet reckless charges because they believe that innocent people may accept the charge in order to avoid the possibility of a DUI charge. This is because the evidence against them may not be strong enough to prove a DUI charge, but they may still feel pressured to accept a plea bargain.

West Virginia | What can states (and state-funded organizations) regulate?

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:38
@Law-Shark: they didn't say we had to go? and if they are willing to buy rooms for a bunch of people. they sent me a res because I was over 50 miles away but I didn't even ask for one
16:42
@Law-Shark: also kind of rude for you to be speaking to me like that, the event started at 9am and I had to wakeup at 4 to drive in. i was tired and couldn't even check in until 4pm if I wanted to so I just drove back. it's unprofessional to offer it the night before and not the day after. they also didn't feed us actual food and we were there until 2pm.
Law-Shark
16:43
The fact you didn't think a reservation in your name is something you need to be responsible for and cancel if you weren't going to show up to by sending a simple email is absolutely iresponsible.
16:43
I didn't make a reservation tho?
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.