Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

whereas

Read a random definition: mixed nuisance

A quick definition of whereas:

Term: WHEREAS

Definition: Whereas is a word used to show contrast or to introduce a fact. It can be used to introduce a statement that is different from what was previously mentioned. For example, "I like ice cream, whereas my sister prefers cake." It can also be used in legal documents to introduce a recital or preamble, which is a statement of facts that explains the purpose of the document. However, modern drafters prefer to use a simple heading instead of the legalistic whereases.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Whereas is a conjunction that is used to contrast two things or to introduce a fact that is important for a legal agreement or contract.

  • While by contrast: McWilliams was stopped at 10:08 p.m. wearing a green hat, whereas the assailant had been identified at 10:04 p.m. wearing a black hat.
  • Given the fact that: Whereas, the parties have found that their 1994 agreement did not adequately address incidental expenses... and Whereas, the parties have now decided in an equitable sharing of those expenses... Now, Therefore, the parties agree to amend the 1994 agreement as follows...

The first example shows how whereas is used to contrast two things. In this case, it is used to show the difference between what McWilliams was wearing and what the assailant was wearing.

The second example shows how whereas is used to introduce an important fact in a legal agreement or contract. In this case, it is used to introduce the fact that the 1994 agreement did not address incidental expenses adequately, which is important for the parties to agree on how to share those expenses equitably.

whereabouts | whereas clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.