Jordy1992

Class of 2028

First choice school:

2.86/4.3

GPA

Health Care Management

165/180

LSAT

User stats

Softs

T3

URM

Work

10+ years

Health Care Administration

Goal

Health Care Law

Apps submitted

0

Scholarships Received

$0

Jordy1992's wisdom for future generations

School apps

Rank	2024-2025	Result	App type	FW	Resident	Schol...	Sent	Sent raw	Received	Received raw	Complete	Complete raw	UR	UR raw	UR2	UR2 raw	II	II raw	Decision	Decision raw
68	UHouston	Pending	RDregular decision				Nov 23	2024-11-23
20	UNorth Carolina	Pending	RDregular decision				Nov 16	2024-11-16	Nov 16	2024-11-16	Nov 19	2024-11-19
66	USouth Carolina	Pending	RDregular decision				Nov 08	2024-11-08	Nov 11	2024-11-11	Nov 11	2024-11-11
25	Wake Forest University	Pending	RDregular decision				Nov 24	2024-11-24

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

Eggan

21:40

if im being honest tho i dont pay much attention to the supreme court. i know how theyll decide cases at this point i dont need to pay attention to the nuance behind a decision anymore because it's going to follow a pattern

Eggan

21:40

thats what would happen with any type of political majority

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:41

the nuance isn’t real they write the reasoning backwards from the holding

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:41

I think a lot of decisions can be very surprising

Eggan

21:42

thats what im saying. i dont pay attention to nuance because theres none to begin with

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:42

I mean Gorsuch authored bostock

[] texaslawhopefully

21:42

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: You probably have already seen this, but it's quite interesting: https://empiricalscotus.com/2024/04/01/charting-the-justices-decisions-cutting-across-ideological-lines/

Eggan

21:42

this is true dolphin

[] texaslawhopefully

21:43

@JumpySubsequentDolphin: he also authored mcgirt

shaquilleoatmeal

21:44

personally i think the 3-3-3 is a lame attempt to justify this lopsided conservative court

Eggan

21:44

ok i dont pay too much attention but from what i gather some justices are conservative in a traditional sense and then you have kavanaugh, alito and thomas which are like conservative to the fault that they will stand by conservativism even if it is failing the system

Eggan

21:45

no offense to conservatives but if people are genuinely suffering from a decision SCOTUS makes, especially disproportionately from any disadvantaged demographic, then i would argue the system is failing

[] texaslawhopefully

21:46

@shaquilleoatmeal: Idk if you look at the data, there's a clear difference between the roberts, barret, gorsuch type and the other three. The three liberal justices are just as unlikely to cross ideological lines as the three most conservative ones.

shaquilleoatmeal

21:48

dont think gorsuch falls in that, its more kav, barret, and to a lesser extent roberts

babycat

21:49

how do you guys feel about the lifetime term?

[] texaslawhopefully

21:49

@shaquilleoatmeal: Gorsuch def crosses party lines more just by virtue of criminal justice & native American cases

shaquilleoatmeal

21:50

gotta keep it, theres no better solution to change it currently. It would fuck the system up if you tried to switch it every 8 years to go with a 2 term presidency and you can't just arbitrarily choose a number like 18 years

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:51

burn it all down democratically elect justices every 2 years

glovediedthisishismom

21:51

21 years and have the whats 9+10 kid announce it

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:51

guys give me good comedy movies

[] texaslawhopefully

21:52

@shaquilleoatmeal: I would agree with that. It'd also just increase the frequency of confirmation hearings and those are always shit shows.

shaquilleoatmeal

21:52

i honestly see the courts as a clear 6-3 but thats just me, check out this article, id be interested to hear more on what you think ! https://ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics/3-3-3-court-no-cmon-not-this-again/

Eggan

21:52

i personally think it should be an 8 year term with a term limit of 3 terms. so 24 years total. and one's position can be given to another candidate as well, doesn't just always go to the incumbent

Eggan

21:52

dont tell me my math is wrong im still tired

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:52

you don’t mess with the zohan is goated

glovediedthisishismom

21:52

fizzy bubbly

shaquilleoatmeal

21:53

@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you want straight up comedy or rom com?

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:54

hmmm I think the people w me would prefer regular comedy

shaquilleoatmeal

21:54

you gotta reform congress, youd see the changes in the supreme court kick in

Eggan

21:55

not to doom but there's no way conservatives would vote for a term limit on SCOTUS if the majority is going to rule in favor of conservative interests in a patterned way

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.