JudiciousChiefAnteater

Class of 2026

First choice school:

3.39/4.3

GPA

160/180

LSAT

User stats

Softs

T3

URM

Work

?

Goal

-

Apps submitted

0

Scholarships Received

$0

JudiciousChiefAnteater's wisdom for future generations

School apps

Rank	2022-2023	Result	App type	FW	Resident	Schol...	Sent	Sent raw	Received	Received raw	Complete	Complete raw	UR	UR raw	UR2	UR2 raw	II	II raw	Decision	Decision raw
134	Campbell University	Accepted, Wi...	RDregular decision			$102,000					Feb 02	2023-02-02							Feb 15	2023-02-15
75	Georgia State Univer...	Rejected	RDregular decision
103	Mercer University	Accepted, Wi...	RDregular decision			$75,000					Jan 10	2023-01-10							Jan 17	2023-01-17
78	Tulane University	Rejected	RDregular decision																Apr 04	2023-04-04
20	UGeorgia	Rejected	RDregular decision
161	UMassachusetts Dartm...	Accepted, Wi...	RDregular decision			$75,000
66	USouth Carolina	WL, Accepted...	RDregular decision			$6,000													Apr 26	2023-04-26
25	Wake Forest University	Rejected	RDregular decision

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

Eggan

21:52

i personally think it should be an 8 year term with a term limit of 3 terms. so 24 years total. and one's position can be given to another candidate as well, doesn't just always go to the incumbent

Eggan

21:52

dont tell me my math is wrong im still tired

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:52

you don’t mess with the zohan is goated

glovediedthisishismom

21:52

fizzy bubbly

shaquilleoatmeal

21:53

@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you want straight up comedy or rom com?

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:54

hmmm I think the people w me would prefer regular comedy

shaquilleoatmeal

21:54

you gotta reform congress, youd see the changes in the supreme court kick in

Eggan

21:55

not to doom but there's no way conservatives would vote for a term limit on SCOTUS if the majority is going to rule in favor of conservative interests in a patterned way

Eggan

21:56

for many people in politics, not just conservatives, the ends justify the means and the means could be anti-american if it means achieving a "patriotic" end so to speak

shaquilleoatmeal

21:56

crazy rich asians, due date (older side of movies), hit man

shaquilleoatmeal

21:57

actually scratch all that - watch no hard feelings

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:58

crazy rich asians is cracked

Eggan

21:58

oh its so good

Eggan

21:58

im probably going to take these comedy suggestions because it's just me alone until like december 1 or 2 i forgor

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:58

@shaquilleoatmeal: my sister in law hated no hard feelings

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:58

Constance Wu is so beautiful

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:58

i forgor

shaquilleoatmeal

21:59

damn what, i thought it was a funny movie

babycat

22:00

i went to this one club that’s in crazy rich Asians. the rooftop bar

[] texaslawhopefully

22:00

@shaquilleoatmeal: It's not a bad article, but I still don't buy it because (a) I think it glosses over cases like Milligan way too quickly without even going into why there was an ideological split (which there was for a reason and that case did matter) and (b) I think the 3-3-3 court description is also grounded in the difference in jurisprudence between the two groups (and that they aligned on cases like the SFAA one could say more about the facts of the case, than jurisprudential differences)

babycat

22:00

It’s called ce la vie

[] texaslawhopefully

22:03

@shaquilleoatmeal: I’ll also preface, I am a little biased—I’m a big fan of Sara Isgur and David French.

shaquilleoatmeal

22:03

^^ advisory opinions ?

shaquilleoatmeal

22:04

i was trying to get into that with scorp before lsd crashed

shaquilleoatmeal

22:04

not aware of Milligan - what was the split and why

[] texaslawhopefully

22:06

Essentially if an Alabama redistricting map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It was 5-4 with Kavanaugh and Robert’s in the majority. A very important case.

[] texaslawhopefully

22:07

@shaquilleoatmeal: yes! I love advisory opinions

[] texaslawhopefully

22:09

@shaquilleoatmeal: https://www.naacpldf.org/case-issue/merrill-v-milligan-faq/#:~:text=Hogan%20Lovells%20LLP.-,Allen%20v.,Supreme%20Court%20in%20recent%20history.

shaquilleoatmeal

22:09

ahh wait i vaguely remember hearing about this, had to do with black belt and mobil i think? Ill have to go back and read it

shaquilleoatmeal

22:10

haha right on, i listen to advisory opinions during my workout when i get tired of tunes

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.