stepdad

Class of 2027

First choice school:

Hidden

3.05/4.3

GPA

151/180

LSAT

User stats

Softs

T4

URM

Work

?

Goal

-

Apps submitted

0

Scholarships Received

$0

stepdad's wisdom for future generations

School apps

Rank	2023-2024	Result	App type	FW	Resident	Schol...	Sent	Sent raw	Received	Received raw	Complete	Complete raw	UR	UR raw	UR2	UR2 raw	II	II raw	Decision	Decision raw
117	Albany Law School Of...	Waitlisted	Unknown																Mar 29	2024-03-29
150	CUNY	Waitlisted	Unknown
178	Capital University	Accepted	Unknown			$90,000													Apr 09	2024-04-09
130	Hofstra University	Waitlisted	Unknown																May 08	2024-05-08
159	New England Law \| Bo...	Rejected	Unknown																Apr 19	2024-04-19
127	New York Law School	Rejected	Unknown																Mar 08	2024-03-08
136	Pace University	Waitlisted	Unknown																Apr 17	2024-04-17
143	Quinnipiac University	Rejected	Unknown																May 23	2024-05-23
172	Roger Williams Unive...	Accepted	Unknown			$105,000													Apr 18	2024-04-18
103	Rutgers State Univer...	Rejected	Unknown				Feb 29	2024-02-29											Apr 08	2024-04-08
68	St. John's University	Rejected	Unknown																Apr 25	2024-04-25
172	St. Thomas Universit...	Accepted, Wi...	Unknown			$0													Apr 14	2024-04-14
168	Touro College	Pending	Unknown

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:51

guys give me good comedy movies

[] texaslawhopefully

21:52

@shaquilleoatmeal: I would agree with that. It'd also just increase the frequency of confirmation hearings and those are always shit shows.

shaquilleoatmeal

21:52

i honestly see the courts as a clear 6-3 but thats just me, check out this article, id be interested to hear more on what you think ! https://ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics/3-3-3-court-no-cmon-not-this-again/

Eggan

21:52

i personally think it should be an 8 year term with a term limit of 3 terms. so 24 years total. and one's position can be given to another candidate as well, doesn't just always go to the incumbent

Eggan

21:52

dont tell me my math is wrong im still tired

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:52

you don’t mess with the zohan is goated

glovediedthisishismom

21:52

fizzy bubbly

shaquilleoatmeal

21:53

@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you want straight up comedy or rom com?

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:54

hmmm I think the people w me would prefer regular comedy

shaquilleoatmeal

21:54

you gotta reform congress, youd see the changes in the supreme court kick in

Eggan

21:55

not to doom but there's no way conservatives would vote for a term limit on SCOTUS if the majority is going to rule in favor of conservative interests in a patterned way

Eggan

21:56

for many people in politics, not just conservatives, the ends justify the means and the means could be anti-american if it means achieving a "patriotic" end so to speak

shaquilleoatmeal

21:56

crazy rich asians, due date (older side of movies), hit man

shaquilleoatmeal

21:57

actually scratch all that - watch no hard feelings

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:58

crazy rich asians is cracked

Eggan

21:58

oh its so good

Eggan

21:58

im probably going to take these comedy suggestions because it's just me alone until like december 1 or 2 i forgor

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:58

@shaquilleoatmeal: my sister in law hated no hard feelings

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:58

Constance Wu is so beautiful

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:58

i forgor

shaquilleoatmeal

21:59

damn what, i thought it was a funny movie

babycat

22:00

i went to this one club that’s in crazy rich Asians. the rooftop bar

[] texaslawhopefully

22:00

@shaquilleoatmeal: It's not a bad article, but I still don't buy it because (a) I think it glosses over cases like Milligan way too quickly without even going into why there was an ideological split (which there was for a reason and that case did matter) and (b) I think the 3-3-3 court description is also grounded in the difference in jurisprudence between the two groups (and that they aligned on cases like the SFAA one could say more about the facts of the case, than jurisprudential differences)

babycat

22:00

It’s called ce la vie

[] texaslawhopefully

22:03

@shaquilleoatmeal: I’ll also preface, I am a little biased—I’m a big fan of Sara Isgur and David French.

shaquilleoatmeal

22:03

^^ advisory opinions ?

shaquilleoatmeal

22:04

i was trying to get into that with scorp before lsd crashed

shaquilleoatmeal

22:04

not aware of Milligan - what was the split and why

[] texaslawhopefully

22:06

Essentially if an Alabama redistricting map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It was 5-4 with Kavanaugh and Robert’s in the majority. A very important case.

[] texaslawhopefully

22:07

@shaquilleoatmeal: yes! I love advisory opinions

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.