Case Citation
Legal Case Name

ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. GREATER PITTSBURGH ACLU Case Brief

Supreme Court of United States1989
492 U.S. 573 109 S.Ct. 3086 106 L.Ed.2d 472

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: The Supreme Court evaluated two separate holiday displays on public property. It found that a lone creche inside a courthouse was an unconstitutional endorsement of Christianity, but a menorah displayed next to a Christmas tree and a sign saluting liberty was permissible under the Establishment Clause.

Legal Significance: This case established Justice O’Connor’s “endorsement test” as the controlling standard for Establishment Clause challenges to religious displays. The constitutionality of such displays now hinges on whether, in its specific context, a reasonable observer would perceive it as a governmental endorsement of religion.

ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. GREATER PITTSBURGH ACLU Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

This case involved two separate holiday displays on public property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The first was a creche, depicting the Christian nativity scene, placed on the Grand Staircase inside the Allegheny County Courthouse, the seat of county government. The creche was the sole feature of the display, adorned with a floral frame and a banner reading “Gloria in Excelsis Deo!” A small sign indicated it was donated by the Holy Name Society, a Catholic group. The second display was located outside the City-County Building. It consisted of an 18-foot Chanukah menorah, owned by a private Jewish organization but erected and stored by the city. The menorah was placed next to a 45-foot Christmas tree and a sign bearing the mayor’s name, titled “Salute to Liberty.” The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued, claiming both displays violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Do a creche displayed alone in a county courthouse and a menorah displayed next to a Christmas tree outside a city-county building constitute governmental endorsements of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause?

Yes, as to the creche; no, as to the menorah. The creche Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Do a creche displayed alone in a county courthouse and a menorah displayed next to a Christmas tree outside a city-county building constitute governmental endorsements of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause?

Conclusion

This decision solidified the context-specific endorsement test as the primary tool for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam

Legal Rule

Under the Establishment Clause, a government practice that touches upon religion is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod

Legal Analysis

The Court, in a fractured opinion authored by Justice Blackmun, adopted the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The Supreme Court held that a crèche inside a courthouse violated
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsu

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Justice is truth in action.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+