Connection lost
Server error
Aquarian Foundation, Inc. v. Sholom House, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A condominium association’s power to arbitrarily reject a sale is an unreasonable restraint on alienation. A clause requiring the association to pay fair market value only after a prohibited sale occurs does not save the restraint because it creates an illusory obligation.
Legal Significance: Establishes that for a restraint on alienation to be valid, any corresponding obligation to purchase (like a preemptive right) must be a meaningful and practical mechanism, not an illusory one that is unlikely to ever be triggered, thereby ensuring the property’s marketability.
Aquarian Foundation, Inc. v. Sholom House, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The declaration of condominium for Sholom House, Inc. required unit owners to obtain written consent from the association’s board of directors before any sale or transfer. The declaration expressly permitted the board to withhold consent “arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably.” A separate “reverter clause” stated that if a unit owner violated this provision, fee simple title would revert to the association, which would then be obligated to pay the former owner the property’s fair appraised value. A unit owner, Bertha Albares, sold her unit to the Aquarian Foundation, Inc. without obtaining the board’s consent. The association sued to enforce the reverter clause, seeking to void the conveyance and have the title revert to itself upon payment of the appraised value. The trial court found for the association and declared the conveyance null and void. Aquarian Foundation appealed, arguing the consent provision was an unreasonable restraint on alienation.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a condominium declaration provision granting the association the power to arbitrarily withhold consent to the transfer of a unit constitute an unreasonable restraint on alienation when the declaration also contains a reverter clause that obligates the association to pay fair market value only after a prohibited transfer has occurred?
Yes. The court held that the power to arbitrarily withhold consent is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat n
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a condominium declaration provision granting the association the power to arbitrarily withhold consent to the transfer of a unit constitute an unreasonable restraint on alienation when the declaration also contains a reverter clause that obligates the association to pay fair market value only after a prohibited transfer has occurred?
Conclusion
This case clarifies that for a restraint on alienation to be reasonable, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillu
Legal Rule
A restraint on the alienation of property, even an absolute one, is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cil
Legal Analysis
The court acknowledged that condominium living justifies increased restrictions on property rights Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in repre
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A condominium declaration clause allowing the association to arbitrarily and capriciously