Connection lost
Server error
BEARDEN v. GEORGIA Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that automatically imprisoning an indigent probationer for failing to pay a fine, without first considering if the failure was willful or if alternative punishments were available, violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of fundamental fairness.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits imprisoning a probationer for a non-willful failure to pay a fine or restitution without first considering alternative punishments. It blends Equal Protection and Due Process principles to protect indigent defendants from imprisonment based solely on their poverty.
BEARDEN v. GEORGIA Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Petitioner Bearden pleaded guilty to burglary and theft in Georgia and was sentenced to three years of probation, conditioned on paying a $500 fine and $250 in restitution. He paid an initial $200 but was subsequently laid off from his job. Despite repeated, bona fide efforts to find new employment, Bearden, who had only a ninth-grade education and could not read, remained unemployed and without assets. He informed his probation officer that he could not make the final payment on time. The State petitioned to revoke his probation for failure to pay. At the revocation hearing, the trial court acknowledged Bearden’s inability to pay but rejected his counsel’s request for an extension or modification. Stating there was no other way to enforce its order, the court revoked his probation and sentenced him to serve the remainder of his probationary period in prison. The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that imprisoning him for inability to pay did not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Fourteenth Amendment permit a state to automatically revoke an indigent defendant’s probation and imprison him for failing to pay a fine and restitution, without first determining that the defendant did not make bona fide efforts to pay or that alternative forms of punishment are inadequate?
No. The Court held that automatically revoking probation and imposing a prison Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the Fourteenth Amendment permit a state to automatically revoke an indigent defendant’s probation and imprison him for failing to pay a fine and restitution, without first determining that the defendant did not make bona fide efforts to pay or that alternative forms of punishment are inadequate?
Conclusion
*Bearden* establishes a crucial procedural and substantive safeguard under the Fourteenth Amendment, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptat
Legal Rule
In probation revocation proceedings for failure to pay a fine or restitution, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laboru
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis merged principles of Due Process and Equal Protection, focusing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits automatically revoking an indigent person’s probation solely