Connection lost
Server error
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. GORE Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A car buyer sued BMW for not disclosing a minor, pre-sale paint repair. The Supreme Court found the resulting $2 million punitive damages award to be “grossly excessive” and therefore an unconstitutional violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
Legal Significance: This landmark case established substantive due process limits on punitive damages, creating a three-part “guidepost” test for courts to determine whether an award is constitutionally excessive. It also limited a state’s power to punish lawful out-of-state conduct.
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. GORE Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Dr. Ira Gore purchased a new BMW sedan for $40,750. He later discovered the vehicle had been repainted prior to sale to fix minor damage incurred during transport, a fact BMW had not disclosed. BMW’s nationwide policy was to not disclose pre-sale repairs if the cost was less than 3% of the car’s suggested retail price. The repair to Dr. Gore’s car cost $601.37, or 1.5% of its value. At trial for suppression of a material fact, Gore’s expert testified the repainting diminished the car’s value by $4,000. To support his punitive damages claim, Gore’s attorney highlighted that BMW had sold 983 similarly refinished cars nationwide. The Alabama jury awarded Gore $4,000 in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages. The Alabama Supreme Court acknowledged the jury improperly based its award on nationwide conduct but ordered a remittitur, reducing the punitive award to $2 million. The court justified this amount by focusing only on BMW’s conduct within Alabama, which involved 14 repainted cars. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine if the $2 million award was constitutionally excessive.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a $2 million punitive damages award for the nondisclosure of a minor, pre-sale vehicle repair, which represents a 500-to-1 ratio to the plaintiff’s actual damages, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as grossly excessive?
Yes. The $2 million punitive damages award against BMW was grossly excessive Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad min
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a $2 million punitive damages award for the nondisclosure of a minor, pre-sale vehicle repair, which represents a 500-to-1 ratio to the plaintiff’s actual damages, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as grossly excessive?
Conclusion
BMW v. Gore is a landmark decision that federalized an area of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco l
Legal Rule
A punitive damages award violates the substantive component of the Due Process Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetu
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause imposes substantive limits Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A punitive damages award that is “grossly excessive” violates the Due
