Connection lost
Server error
Bond v. United States Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A woman prosecuted under a federal chemical weapons statute for a local assault challenged the law’s validity. The Supreme Court held she had standing to argue the statute exceeded federal power and violated principles of federalism, as federalism protects individual liberty, not just states’ rights.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that an individual defendant has standing to challenge a federal law on the grounds that it violates principles of federalism and the Tenth Amendment, because the constitutional division of power between federal and state governments is a fundamental protection of individual liberty.
Bond v. United States Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Petitioner Carol Anne Bond, seeking revenge against a friend who had an affair with her husband, placed caustic chemicals on the friend’s car door handle, mailbox, and doorknob. The victim suffered a minor burn. Federal prosecutors charged Bond under 18 U.S.C. § 229, a statute implementing the international Chemical Weapons Convention, which criminalizes the use of chemical weapons. Bond moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that the statute, as applied to her simple, local assault, exceeded Congress’s enumerated powers and infringed on the police powers reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. The District Court denied her motion. On appeal, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held that Bond, as a private individual, lacked standing to raise a Tenth Amendment challenge because such claims belong to the states, not individuals. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether an individual has standing to raise a federalism-based challenge to a federal statute.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does an individual criminal defendant have standing to challenge a federal statute on the grounds that it exceeds Congress’s enumerated powers and intrudes upon the sovereignty of the states?
Yes. The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals, holding that Bond Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, co
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does an individual criminal defendant have standing to challenge a federal statute on the grounds that it exceeds Congress’s enumerated powers and intrudes upon the sovereignty of the states?
Conclusion
The decision in *Bond I* confirms that federalism is a source of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labor
Legal Rule
An individual who suffers a concrete and redressable injury from the enforcement Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labo
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis centered on the principle that constitutional structural protections, such Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris n
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A criminal defendant has standing to challenge a federal statute on