Connection lost
Server error
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A private organization’s First Amendment right of expressive association allows it to exclude a gay man from a leadership position, despite a state law prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination, because his presence would significantly impair the group’s ability to express its views.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that the First Amendment right of expressive association can override state public accommodations laws when forced inclusion of a member would significantly burden an organization’s ability to advocate its chosen message, granting deference to the organization’s own definition of its message.
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA), a private, non-profit organization, has a stated mission to instill values in young people based on the Scout Oath and Law, which includes being “morally straight” and “clean.” James Dale, a former Eagle Scout, was an assistant scoutmaster whose adult membership was revoked after BSA learned he was an avowed homosexual and a gay rights activist. BSA asserted that homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the values it seeks to instill. Dale filed suit in New Jersey, alleging that his expulsion violated the state’s public accommodations law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the state law required BSA to readmit Dale, finding that BSA was a place of public accommodation and that Dale’s inclusion would not significantly affect the organization’s ability to express its views. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether applying the New Jersey law in this manner violated BSA’s First Amendment rights.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the application of a state’s public accommodations law to compel a private organization to accept a member whose presence significantly impairs the organization’s ability to express its views violate the First Amendment right of expressive association?
Yes. Applying New Jersey’s public accommodations law to require the Boy Scouts Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est la
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the application of a state’s public accommodations law to compel a private organization to accept a member whose presence significantly impairs the organization’s ability to express its views violate the First Amendment right of expressive association?
Conclusion
The decision solidifies the principle that a private organization's First Amendment right Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut al
Legal Rule
The forced inclusion of an unwanted person in a group infringes the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis proceeded in three parts. First, it determined that BSA Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit an
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A state’s public accommodations law cannot be used to force a