Connection lost
Server error
BRANZBURG v. HAYES Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Reporters claimed a First Amendment privilege to protect confidential sources from grand jury subpoenas. The Supreme Court rejected this, holding that the First Amendment does not grant journalists a special right to refuse to testify about criminal conduct they observed or were told about.
Legal Significance: The case established that the First Amendment’s Free Press Clause does not create a testimonial privilege for journalists, subordinating newsgathering interests to the grand jury’s broad power to investigate crime. It remains the key precedent on reporter’s privilege.
BRANZBURG v. HAYES Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
This case consolidated three separate matters involving journalists who refused to testify before grand juries. In one, reporter Paul Branzburg observed individuals making hashish and wrote an article about it after promising his sources anonymity. He was subpoenaed by a Kentucky grand jury to identify them. In another, television newsman Paul Pappas was permitted inside Black Panther headquarters during civil disorders on the condition he not disclose what he saw. He was later subpoenaed by a Massachusetts grand jury. In the third, Earl Caldwell, a New York Times reporter covering the Black Panther Party, was subpoenaed by a federal grand jury to testify about the group’s activities. All three reporters refused to provide the requested information, asserting a qualified testimonial privilege under the First Amendment. They argued that compelling them to reveal confidential sources or information would deter future sources from speaking to the press, thereby impeding the free flow of information to the public.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press grant a reporter a constitutional testimonial privilege to refuse to appear and testify before a grand jury regarding information received from a confidential source?
No. The Court held that requiring reporters to testify before a grand Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press grant a reporter a constitutional testimonial privilege to refuse to appear and testify before a grand jury regarding information received from a confidential source?
Conclusion
The decision established that no federal constitutional reporter's privilege exists, leaving journalists Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis
Legal Rule
The First Amendment does not provide reporters with a testimonial privilege, either Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nos
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis centered on the principle that the First Amendment does Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad mi
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Holding: The First Amendment does not grant reporters a testimonial privilege