Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Buck v. Bell Case Brief

Supreme Court of the United States1927Docket #902018
274 U.S. 200 47 S. Ct. 584 71 L. Ed. 1000 1927 U.S. LEXIS 20

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: The Supreme Court upheld a Virginia statute authorizing the compulsory sterilization of a woman deemed “feeble minded” in a state institution. The Court found the state’s interest in public welfare outweighed her individual rights, famously stating, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

Legal Significance: A landmark, though now widely discredited, decision affirming the state’s police power to compel sterilization of “unfit” individuals. It represents a low point for substantive due process, prioritizing perceived public welfare over fundamental rights of bodily integrity and procreation.

Buck v. Bell Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Carrie Buck, a young woman, was committed to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded. The state courts found that she was “feeble minded,” the daughter of a “feeble minded” mother who was also in the institution, and the mother of an “illegitimate feeble minded” child. A 1924 Virginia law authorized the sexual sterilization of inmates of certain state institutions if the institution’s superintendent determined it was in the best interest of the patient and society. The statute was premised on the legislative finding that heredity plays a significant role in the transmission of insanity and imbecility, and that sterilization would allow certain inmates to be discharged without becoming a “menace to society.” The law provided for procedural safeguards, including a petition, notice, a hearing, and the right to appeal through the state court system. The superintendent at the State Colony initiated this process for Buck. After the procedure was approved at the administrative level and affirmed by the Virginia state courts, Buck appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing the statute violated her Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a state statute authorizing the compulsory sterilization of individuals deemed intellectually disabled in state custody violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?

No. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the Virginia statute Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint oc

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does a state statute authorizing the compulsory sterilization of individuals deemed intellectually disabled in state custody violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

Buck v. Bell stands as a stark example of judicial deference to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in re

Legal Rule

A state may, pursuant to its police power, compel the sterilization of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit

Legal Analysis

Writing for the majority, Justice Holmes framed the issue as a matter Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id es

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The Court upheld a Virginia statute authorizing compulsory sterilization of the
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute ir

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Justice is truth in action.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+