Connection lost
Server error
CELOTEX CORP. v. CATRETT Case Brief
Audio Insights: Learn Cases on The Go
Transform downtime into productive study time with our premium audio insights. Perfect for commutes, workouts, or visual breaks from reading.
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A defendant moving for summary judgment does not need to produce evidence disproving the plaintiff’s claim. Instead, the defendant can meet its burden by pointing out that the plaintiff lacks sufficient evidence to support an essential element of their case.
Legal Significance: This case redefined the burden on a party moving for summary judgment under FRCP 56. It established that a movant can prevail by demonstrating the nonmoving party’s failure of proof, making summary judgment a more potent tool for dismissing factually unsupported claims.
CELOTEX CORP. v. CATRETT Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Respondent Catrett filed a wrongful-death lawsuit alleging her husband’s death resulted from exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured by petitioner Celotex Corp. and 14 other corporations. During discovery, Celotex served interrogatories asking Catrett to identify any witnesses who could testify to the decedent’s exposure to its products. Catrett failed to identify any such witnesses. Celotex then moved for summary judgment, arguing that Catrett had failed to produce any evidence of exposure to its products, an essential element of her claim. Celotex did not submit any affidavits or other evidence of its own to affirmatively disprove that the decedent had been exposed. In response, Catrett produced three documents she claimed demonstrated a genuine issue of material fact regarding exposure. The District Court granted summary judgment for Celotex, finding “no showing that the plaintiff was exposed to the defendant Celotex’s product.” The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed, holding that Celotex’s motion was “fatally defective” because it was not supported by any evidence, such as affidavits, tending to negate exposure. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split on the issue.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, must a party moving for summary judgment support its motion with affidavits or other evidence that affirmatively negates an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim?
Yes, reversed and remanded. A moving party is not required to produce Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit ani
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, must a party moving for summary judgment support its motion with affidavits or other evidence that affirmatively negates an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim?
Conclusion
Celotex v. Catrett fundamentally altered summary judgment practice by clarifying that a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud ex
Legal Rule
A party moving for summary judgment is not required to support its Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat n
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Rehnquist, held that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim v
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A party moving for summary judgment does not need to produce
