Connection lost
Server error
CLINTON v. JONES Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A woman sued the sitting President for civil damages based on conduct that occurred before he took office. The Supreme Court held that the Constitution does not grant a sitting President temporary immunity from such lawsuits.
Legal Significance: Established that the President is not immune from civil litigation for unofficial acts committed before taking office. The Court affirmed that the separation of powers doctrine does not require federal courts to defer such lawsuits until the President’s term ends.
CLINTON v. JONES Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Paula Corbin Jones filed a civil lawsuit against President William Jefferson Clinton in federal court. The suit alleged that in 1991, while Clinton was Governor of Arkansas, he made sexual advances toward her, a state employee. Jones claimed that her rejection of these advances led to negative consequences in her job. The complaint included federal claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, and state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation. The alleged misconduct was unrelated to Clinton’s official duties as President and occurred before he was elected to that office. In response, President Clinton moved to dismiss the complaint without prejudice, arguing for temporary Presidential immunity. He contended that the Constitution requires federal courts to defer all civil damages litigation against a sitting President for unofficial conduct until after the conclusion of his term. The District Court denied the immunity claim but stayed the trial until after the President left office. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of immunity but reversed the stay, allowing the case to proceed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the constitutional question of temporary presidential immunity.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the doctrine of separation of powers or the concept of presidential immunity require federal courts to grant a sitting President temporary immunity from civil damages litigation arising from events that occurred before he took office?
No. The Court held that neither the doctrine of separation of powers Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa q
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the doctrine of separation of powers or the concept of presidential immunity require federal courts to grant a sitting President temporary immunity from civil damages litigation arising from events that occurred before he took office?
Conclusion
This decision firmly establishes that the President, like other citizens, is subject Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
Legal Rule
The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis centered on two key constitutional arguments: presidential immunity and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A sitting President is not immune from civil litigation for acts