Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Commonwealth v. Welansky Case Brief

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court1944Docket #63501150
316 Mass. 383 55 N.E.2d 902 1944 Mass. LEXIS 742 Criminal Law Torts Business Organizations

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: A nightclub owner was convicted of involuntary manslaughter after a deadly fire. The court found his intentional and long-standing failure to provide adequate fire safety measures constituted wanton or reckless conduct, the necessary mental state for the crime, even though he was hospitalized during the event.

Legal Significance: This case establishes that involuntary manslaughter can be based on a defendant’s reckless omissions where a duty of care exists. It defines the required mens rea as “wanton or reckless conduct,” a standard higher than civil negligence and considered the legal equivalent of intentional conduct.

Commonwealth v. Welansky Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

The defendant, Barnett Welansky, was the owner and operator of the New Cocoanut Grove nightclub, exercising complete control over its business and premises. On November 28, 1942, a catastrophic fire killed hundreds of patrons. An investigation revealed numerous systemic safety failures attributable to Welansky’s direction. Key emergency exits were locked, obscured, or otherwise rendered inoperable to prevent patrons from leaving without paying. For instance, a main emergency exit was regularly locked with a key kept in an office, and another was blocked by tables and hidden behind inward-swinging decorative doors. The club was also overcrowded and filled with flammable decorations. At the time of the fire, Welansky was in the hospital and had been for several days. However, the unsafe conditions were not transitory but were part of the club’s standard operating procedure established and maintained by him. The Commonwealth charged Welansky with nineteen counts of involuntary manslaughter, arguing his conduct constituted a wanton or reckless disregard for the safety of his patrons.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Can a defendant be convicted of involuntary manslaughter for deaths resulting from his intentional failure to provide adequate safety measures, where such omissions constitute a wanton or reckless disregard for human life?

Yes. The court affirmed Welansky’s convictions, holding that his sustained, intentional failure Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veni

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Can a defendant be convicted of involuntary manslaughter for deaths resulting from his intentional failure to provide adequate safety measures, where such omissions constitute a wanton or reckless disregard for human life?

Conclusion

This case serves as a landmark decision in criminal law, affirming that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco lab

Legal Rule

Involuntary manslaughter may be predicated upon an omission to act where there Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehende

Legal Analysis

The court's analysis centered on defining the mental state required for common Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Involuntary manslaughter can be based on an omission or failure to
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

I feel like I'm in a constant state of 'motion to compel' more sleep.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+