Connection lost
Server error
Dames & Moore v. Regan Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court upheld the President’s executive agreement to end the Iran hostage crisis, which nullified court-ordered attachments on Iranian assets and suspended private claims against Iran. The actions were justified by statute and a history of congressional acquiescence in foreign affairs.
Legal Significance: This case refines the Youngstown framework, establishing that a history of congressional acquiescence can authorize presidential action in foreign policy crises, particularly in the “zone of twilight” where Congress has not explicitly spoken. It affirms the President’s power to settle international claims by executive agreement.
Dames & Moore v. Regan Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Following the seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979, President Carter, acting under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), declared a national emergency and froze all Iranian government assets within U.S. jurisdiction. The Treasury Department issued regulations permitting lawsuits against Iran but specified that any resulting pre-judgment attachments were subject to revocable licenses. Petitioner Dames & Moore filed suit for breach of contract and obtained such attachments. To secure the hostages’ release, the U.S. entered into the Algiers Accords, an executive agreement with Iran. The Accords required the U.S. to terminate all legal proceedings against Iran, nullify all attachments, and transfer Iranian assets. Claims were to be resolved by a new Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. Presidents Carter and Reagan issued Executive Orders implementing these terms, suspending all claims in U.S. courts and ordering the transfer of assets. Dames & Moore challenged the President’s actions as exceeding his constitutional and statutory authority.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the President have the constitutional and statutory authority to nullify attachments on Iranian assets and suspend private claims against Iran in U.S. courts as part of an executive agreement to resolve a major foreign policy crisis?
Yes. The President’s actions were constitutional. The nullification of attachments was specifically Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupida
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the President have the constitutional and statutory authority to nullify attachments on Iranian assets and suspend private claims against Iran in U.S. courts as part of an executive agreement to resolve a major foreign policy crisis?
Conclusion
The decision provides a crucial, pragmatic application of the *Youngstown* framework, affirming Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Legal Rule
The President has authority to act in foreign affairs where his action Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
Legal Analysis
The Court applied the analytical framework from Justice Jackson's concurrence in *Youngstown Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The President has explicit statutory authority under the International Emergency Economic