Connection lost
Server error
Ernst v. Conditt Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A landlord sued a subsequent tenant for unpaid rent. Despite the transfer agreement being labeled a “sublease,” the court found it was actually an assignment because the original tenant transferred his entire interest, making the new tenant directly liable to the landlord.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that the substance of a leasehold transfer—whether the lessee conveys their entire interest—determines if it is an assignment, not the formal language (e.g., “sublet”) used by the parties. It prioritizes the parties’ intent and the transaction’s effect over technical labels.
Ernst v. Conditt Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Complainants B. Walter Ernst and Emily Ernst leased a tract of land to Frank Rogers for a one-year term to operate a Go-Cart track. The lease required the lessors’ written consent for any assignment or sublease. Rogers subsequently negotiated to sell the business to the defendant, A. K. Conditt. Conditt desired a longer lease term. Consequently, the Ernsts, Rogers, and Conditt executed an amendment that extended the lease term to two years. This amendment document stated, “Lessor hereby consents to the subletting of the premises to A. K. Conditt,” but also stipulated that Rogers would remain personally liable for all lease covenants. Immediately following, Rogers executed a transfer to Conditt, using the term “sublet,” which conveyed his entire remaining interest in the newly amended lease term. Conditt took possession and paid rent directly to the Ernsts for several months before defaulting. Conditt remained in possession until the lease expired but failed to pay the remaining rent or remove the improvements as required by the lease. The Ernsts sued Conditt directly, arguing the transfer was an assignment creating privity of estate.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a transfer of a leasehold constitute an assignment, creating privity of estate between the lessor and the transferee, when the agreement conveys the original lessee’s entire interest for the full remaining term, despite being labeled a “sublet”?
The court held that the transfer from Rogers to Conditt was an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a transfer of a leasehold constitute an assignment, creating privity of estate between the lessor and the transferee, when the agreement conveys the original lessee’s entire interest for the full remaining term, despite being labeled a “sublet”?
Conclusion
This case solidifies the principle that in landlord-tenant law, the legal substance Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim v
Legal Rule
In Tennessee, the cardinal rule for construing written instruments is to ascertain Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupida
Legal Analysis
The court analyzed the distinction between an assignment and a sublease under Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A transfer of a lessee’s entire interest for the full remaining