Connection lost
Server error
Farmer v. Brennan Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A transsexual inmate sued prison officials after being assaulted, claiming an Eighth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court held that “deliberate indifference” requires officials to have subjective knowledge of a substantial risk of serious harm and to disregard that risk, establishing a criminal recklessness standard.
Legal Significance: This case established the subjective standard for “deliberate indifference” under the Eighth Amendment, requiring a plaintiff to prove a prison official had actual awareness of a substantial risk of harm. It rejected an objective “should have known” test for prison conditions claims.
Farmer v. Brennan Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Petitioner Dee Farmer, a pre-operative transsexual inmate who projected feminine characteristics, was transferred to a high-security federal penitentiary and placed in its general population. The penitentiary was known to have a violent environment. Within two weeks, Farmer was beaten and raped by another inmate. Farmer filed a Bivens action against prison officials, alleging they violated the Eighth Amendment by being deliberately indifferent to the substantial risk of serious harm. Farmer contended that officials knew of the penitentiary’s violent nature and that an inmate with feminine characteristics would be particularly vulnerable to sexual assault. The district court granted summary judgment for the officials, concluding they lacked the requisite “actual knowledge” of a potential danger to Farmer, in part because Farmer never expressed any specific concern for safety to them. The Court of Appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split over the proper test for deliberate indifference.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a prison official’s “deliberate indifference” to a substantial risk of serious harm to an inmate, in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, require a showing that the official had subjective knowledge of the risk?
Yes. The Court held that “deliberate indifference” entails a subjective state of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cill
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a prison official’s “deliberate indifference” to a substantial risk of serious harm to an inmate, in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, require a showing that the official had subjective knowledge of the risk?
Conclusion
This decision solidified the subjective culpability requirement for Eighth Amendment prison conditions Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullam
Legal Rule
A prison official violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse
Legal Analysis
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Souter, grounded its reasoning in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Eighth Amendment standard for “deliberate indifference” in prison conditions cases