Connection lost
Server error
Freeman v. Pitts Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A school district experienced resegregation due to demographic shifts while under a court order. The Supreme Court held that federal courts can incrementally withdraw supervision from areas where the district has complied, even if full compliance has not been achieved in all areas.
Legal Significance: Established that federal courts may relinquish control over school districts in stages (“incremental withdrawal”). It also clarified that districts are not obligated to remedy racial imbalances caused by private demographic shifts untraceable to the prior constitutional violation.
Freeman v. Pitts Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The DeKalb County School System (DCSS) had been under a federal desegregation decree since 1969. The initial plan, based on neighborhood schools, temporarily achieved desegregation. Over the next 17 years, significant demographic changes occurred, with a large influx of Black residents into the southern part of the county and corresponding migration of White residents out of that area. This resulted in substantial racial resegregation in the schools, with many schools becoming predominantly Black or predominantly White. In 1986, DCSS moved to be declared “unitary” and have the decree dissolved. The District Court found DCSS had achieved compliance in four areas identified in Green v. School Bd. of New Kent County: student assignments, transportation, physical facilities, and extracurricular activities. It attributed the current racial imbalance in student attendance to private demographic changes, not state action. However, it found vestiges of the prior de jure system remained in faculty assignments and resource allocation. The court decided to relinquish supervision over the compliant areas while retaining it over the non-compliant ones. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that a court must retain full remedial authority until a school system achieves unitary status in all categories simultaneously.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May a federal district court, in supervising a school desegregation decree, relinquish control over discrete aspects of the school system in which compliance has been achieved while retaining supervision over other aspects where vestiges of de jure segregation remain?
Yes. A district court may relinquish supervision and control over aspects of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehender
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
May a federal district court, in supervising a school desegregation decree, relinquish control over discrete aspects of the school system in which compliance has been achieved while retaining supervision over other aspects where vestiges of de jure segregation remain?
Conclusion
This case significantly altered desegregation jurisprudence by authorizing a phased withdrawal of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim ve
Legal Rule
A federal court has the discretion to order an incremental or partial Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, su
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy, emphasized that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commo
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Federal courts may relinquish supervision of school districts in desegregation cases